Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/838/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/838/2005 Generato dall'IA

Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence

Numero d'incarto ATAS/838/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought to recover damages for a breach of warranty regarding materials supplied for the construction of a municipal improvement project, alleging the materials failed to meet specified engineering standards, causing delays and increased costs. The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence: The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di costruzione risarcimento contrattuale del danno grado della prova garanzia per i difetti della cosa contratto di registrazione violazione della buona fede

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
A/3276/2007
Contractual Quality Dispute and Extrinsic Evidence Admissibility
A/485/2005
Construction Defects and Contractual Liability Dispute
A/677/2004
Construction Contract Dispute and Material Breach Determination
A/4700/2006
Breach of Construction Contract Dispute
A/330/2005
Construction Contract Breach and Damages

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

                 

!!"

 ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

%&'   ( ) *+*   



 !"#$%&$''" '"' (&$'')$ '



$

    *    *!$# '&4' *"'!+,!-$%. '/ #$01,2!3233    0

       

   .252. 

'"'',%277+!&#'389277+!$#:'/

;''9/;'$%$#$<$$!-; %$';$&/

! %" , - $" ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $" ( .++*   / 0+*1*'' 2 .3 4 5 $67

3= $<    *    *'-;#$' %< !<$$$$!#>'#?$ '$$#&!"$$'+(7774=#''$$"#$=

2= ;@'"$$-'A=

1=  $ ? #$ '  -; $ % - $$ "" $ %&   "#$ A ' ;%$ ' $! '; <  4 ' " ';$A 277+=

,= $< ''%-#&:'!$' -;?'&#=

+= ##$';$=+7 !4"#$'-;#%$4" $#&$B$''&'179':$4$## ""'&'& A4&'&'!*CDEC4-0!077,   !$?"#='&#$B$#>&="&"'$F G'-?$"$-'&$'&A$$#' '&$$-&/AG?##-"$4$"#%'"'$$ $'&/G#$>$'#&$$=*"&" $$ #  $ &&"$ &"&&  $$ G AG $ G .'!  A4&'&'##$"$:-; '%'&%A="&"'"$"@ ' #%! - $ 9$!  -  '& $$-& $ ;%## ' -&$&?#&'&$H$=312!370$37IG=    >44:F &'$F       *@% J K A*

#4"'#&$B$$$4&?#$-;<;444&'& '#>44



562+5277+