Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/835/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/835/2008 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/835/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal lodged by an individual against a decision made by the cantonal employment office following an objection. The appellant subsequently submitted a letter indicating the withdrawal of the appeal. The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and, as a result, struck the case from the roll, concluding the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal: The appellant subsequently submitted a letter indicating the withdrawal of the appeal. The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and, as a result, struck the case from the roll, concluding the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono definitivo del procedimento ritiro della querela penale azione in revoca tacita revoca dell'opposizione decisione incidentale impugnabile ricorso del personale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is used by implication as the court takes note of the withdrawal and rules on the case, which typically involves procedural costs, although none are explicitly mentioned in the dispositive for this specific decision concerning withdrawal.
Generato dall'IA
A/1413/2015
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal in Employment Dispute
A/1426/2020
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Removal
A/248/2011
Appeal Withdrawal in Employment Dispute
A/3100/2014
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Employment Office Decision
A/2285/2015
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is used by implication as the court takes note of the withdrawal and rules on the case, which typically involves procedural costs, although none are explicitly mentioned in the dispositive for this specific decision concerning withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/841/2008 ATAS/835/2008

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 24 juillet 2008

En la cause

Monsieur D__________, domicilié à GENEVE, comparant avec recourant élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître WAVRE Jean-Pierre

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'EMPLOI, Service juridique, Glacisintimé de-Rive 6, case postale 3039, 1211 Genève 3

Siégeant :Karine STECK, Présidente; Olivier LEVY et Christine KOEPPEL, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition de l'Office cantonal de l'emploi du 8 février 2008 à l'encontre de Monsieur D__________,

Vu le recours interjeté par ce dernier en date du 13 mars 2008,

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 29 avril 2008,

Vu le courrier du recourant du 24 juin 2008 dans lequel il indique retirer son recours;

Attendu qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Brigitte LUSCHER Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/841/2008