Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/806/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/806/2014 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision

Numero d'incarto ATAS/806/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a supplementary benefits service decision primarily concerning an outstanding medical invoice of CHF 88.30, but subsequently informed the court upon receiving notice of a personal appearance hearing that they were withdrawing both their opposition and their appeal. The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision: The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari revoca dell'opposizione revoca di prestazioni sociali audizione personale riesame della rendita AI rinvio ad separatum

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.
Generato dall'IA
A/1457/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/1947/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/2615/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/4080/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
A/1776/2014
Claimant Withdraws Appeal of Supplementary Benefits Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/852/2014 ATAS/806/2014

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 27 juin 2014 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à COINTRIN recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis intimé DEAS - SPC; Route de Chêne 54; Case postale 6375, GENEVE

Siégeant : Francine PAYOT ZEN-RUFFINEN, Présidente; Pierre-Bernard PETITAT et Jean-Pierre WAVRE, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 25 février 2014, Vu le recours du 18 mars 2014 portant principalement sur une facture médicale de CHF 88,30, Vu la réponse du 17 avril 2014, Vu la convocation à l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 23 juin 2014; Attendu qu'à la réception de la convocation la recourante a indiqué qu'elle renonçait à son opposition, et par conséquent, retirait son recours; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Brigitte BABEL Francine PAYOT ZEN- RUFFINEN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/852/2014