Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/806/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/806/2007 Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal Following Settlement

Numero d'incarto ATAS/806/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual filed a payment claim against a pension foundation, but during the proceedings, the parties engaged in discussions, leading the claimant to notify the court on June 26, 2007, that an agreement had been reached, rendering the initial claim without object and requesting a withdrawal of the action. Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Court acknowledged the withdrawal of the claim and ordered the case to be struck from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claim Withdrawal Following Settlement: Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Court acknowledged the withdrawal of the claim and ordered the case to be struck from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ritiro a seguito di transazione procedura di assicurazioni sociali azione creditoria revoca della rendita d'invalidità restituzione di prestazioni complementari diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision likely governs the decision regarding costs, although costs are not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive in this specific excerpt, standard practice often links dispositive actions like discontinuance to cost implications, or it might be implicitly applied by analogy in cantonal proceedings when dismissing based on settlement/withdrawal, but since the provided dispositive is minimal, and based strictly on the instruction to include only provisions cited in the numbered orders, and no such citation appears in the numbered orders (which are just 'Prend acte' and 'Raye'), this would be excluded unless the decision text contained a citation in the final numbered orders.
Generato dall'IA
A/659/2008
Pension Foundation Payment Claim Withdrawal Due to Settlement
A/1899/2017
Withdrawal of Payment Claim Following Settlement
A/1618/2004
Claimant v. Pension Foundation: Settlement and Withdrawal of Claim
A/2905/2008
Pension Foundation Settlement and Withdrawal of Claim
A/4255/2007
Pension Foundation Dissolution and Claim Withdrawal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision likely governs the decision regarding costs, although costs are not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive in this specific excerpt, standard practice often links dispositive actions like discontinuance to cost implications, or it might be implicitly applied by analogy in cantonal proceedings when dismissing based on settlement/withdrawal, but since the provided dispositive is minimal, and based strictly on the instruction to include only provisions cited in the numbered orders, and no such citation appears in the numbered orders (which are just 'Prend acte' and 'Raye'), this would be excluded unless the decision text contained a citation in the final numbered orders.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/969/2007

### [ATAS/806/2007](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1960366) du 11.07.2007 ( LPP ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2007/0008/ATAS_000806_2007_A_969_2007.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/969/2007 ATAS/806/2007 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 4 du 11 juillet 2007

En la cause

Madame M_________, domiciliée , LARRINGES, France · recourante

contre

ZURICH SUISSE - FONDATIONS DE PREVOYANCE DU PERSONNEL, Avenue Eugène-Pittard 16, GENEVE · intimé

Vu la demande en paiement déposée le 9 mars 2007 par Madame M_________ (ci-après la demanderesse),

Vu la lettre des FONDATIONS DE PREVOYANCE DU PERSONNEL DE LA GENEVOISE ASSURANCES du 26 avril 2007, informant le Tribunal de céans que ces dernières étaient en liquidation selon publication dans la Feuille d'Avis Officielle du 9 mars 2007 et que les conseils de fondation tiendront une séance le 31 mai 2007 afin de débattre de la suite à donner à la présente procédure,

Vu les pourparlers engagés entre les parties,

Attendu qu'en date du 26 juin 2007, la demanderesse a communiqué au Tribunal de céans que les parties étaient parvenues à un accord que sa demande devenait sans objet et que la cause pouvait être rayée du rôle avec désistement d'action;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Sylvie CHAMOUX · La Présidente : Juliana BALDE

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le