Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/787/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/787/2008 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal Following Conciliation in AVS Matter

Numero d'incarto ATAS/787/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal filed by an individual against a decision rendered by the interprofessional pension fund concerning AVS matters. Following the filing of the appeal and the fund's response, the parties attended a personal appearance and engaged in discussions, leading to a conciliation proposal by the Tribunal which the appellant accepted, and the fund confirmed its agreement. Consequently, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal Following Conciliation in AVS Matter: Following the filing of the appeal and the fund's response, the parties attended a personal appearance and engaged in discussions, leading to a conciliation proposal by the Tribunal which the appellant accepted, and the fund confirmed its agreement. Consequently, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo pensionistico revoca della rendita d'invalidità ritiro a seguito di transazione revoca dell'opposizione esperimento di conciliazione accordo interprofessionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The article governing the costs of the proceedings is cited in the dispositive implicitly through the overall procedure, as the parties accepted the conciliation and the appeal was withdrawn, leading to the case being struck from the roll, but the explicit mention of costs is usually standard in such final orders following withdrawal and conciliation, although the dispositive here is minimal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/719/2008

### [ATAS/787/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1961766) du 01.07.2008 ( AVS ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0007/ATAS_000787_2008_A_719_2008.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/719/2008 ATAS/787/2008 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 2 du 1er juillet 2008

En la cause

Monsieur F_________, domicilié à COINTRIN, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître PETITAT Pierre-Bernard · recourant

contre

FER CIAM 106.1, sise Rue de St-Jean 98, GENEVE · intimée

Vu la décision sur opposition du 7 février 2008 rendue par la CAISSE INTERPROFESSIONNELLE AVS DE LA FEDERATION DES ENTREPRISES ROMANDES FER-CIAM (ci-après la caisse),

Vu le recours interjeté le 4 mars 2008 par Monsieur F_________ (ci-après le recourant),

Vu la réponse de la caisse du 8 avril 2008,

Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 6 mai 2008 et les pourparlers entre les parties;

Vu la proposition de conciliation du Tribunal du 6 juin 2008, acceptée en audience par le recourant ;

Vu l'accord de la caisse confirmé par courrier du 6 juin 2008, et le retrait du recours consécutif du 30 juin 2008;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait du recours.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Yaël BENZ · La Présidente : Isabelle DUBOIS

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le