Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/575/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/575/2016 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits

Numero d'incarto ATAS/575/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant filed an appeal against a decision regarding supplementary benefits issued by the administrative service. During the scheduled hearing, the applicant formally withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber noted the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the court's register, concluding the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits: During the scheduled hearing, the applicant formally withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber noted the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the court's register, concluding the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca di prestazioni sociali prestazioni complementari revoca della decisione amministrativa ritiro della querela penale tacita revoca dell'opposizione legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is implicitly cited as the court orders the dropping of the case, which usually entails consequences for costs, although no explicit cost order is detailed here, standard procedure applies.
Generato dall'IA
A/114/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
A/1049/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/2182/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision
A/928/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
A/2734/2016
Applicant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is implicitly cited as the court orders the dropping of the case, which usually entails consequences for costs, although no explicit cost order is detailed here, standard procedure applies.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4577/2015

### [ATAS/575/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1972154) du 12.07.2016 ( PC ) , RETIRE [![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0005/ATAS_000575_2016_A_4577_2015.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/840/2006 ATAS/757/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 12 juillet 2016 2ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE · recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE · intimé Vu la décision sur opposition du 28 mai 2015 du service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC) ; Vu le recours de Madame A______ du 25 juin 2015 ; Vu la réponse du 12 février 2016 ; Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 12 juillet 2016 ; Attendu que lors de cette audience, la recourante a indiqué qu’elle retirait son recours ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

\* \* \* \* \*

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Sylvie SCHNEWLIN · Le président Raphaël MARTIN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le