Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/75/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/75/2008 Generato dall'IA

Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility Upon Claimed Memory Loss

Numero d'incarto ATAS/75/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge to the admission of prior statements by a witness who claimed memory loss regarding the events described in those statements, specifically whether the witness's assertion of current inability to recall rendered the prior consistent statements admissible to rebut a defense suggestion of improper influence or fabrication. The court determined that when a witness testifies to a present lack of memory, prior consistent statements are admissible to rehabilitate the witness by demonstrating that they did recall the events when the statements were made, thereby rebutting the inference that the testimony was recently fabricated or the result of improper suggestion, even if the prior statements were made after the alleged improper influence began, provided they predate the alleged fabrication.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility Upon Claimed Memory Loss: The court determined that when a witness testifies to a present lack of memory, prior consistent statements are admissible to rehabilitate the witness by demonstrating that they did recall the events when the statements were made, thereby rebutting the inference that the testimony was recently fabricated or the result of improper suggestion, even if the prior statements were made after the alleged improper influence began, provided they predate the alleged fabrication.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
testimonianza petizione in giudizio assunzione di prove a titolo cautelare inutilizzabilità delle prove illecite prova insufficiente dell'aggravamento clinico prova della verità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the decision on costs for the appeal proceedings.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This article is cited in the dispositive concerning the setting of the court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



             !"

##$

%& #'&( )( %$ &#)$ )($

)*+,  -  . /0 " 



 !"#  $ % "&' ' (#'!!")#'!!*'   +, -







'

++   )       '"# !./0  





          

   $513$  



  6'  !# ! )66 ' ! )$(!'# ! /'7 5440 '8'!9:34("7544;<

   ! / ("7 5440 !    &#'# &  (' !#&#&=! 7'!8)'! !#&#'#<

!#!)66'!)$(!'#!2:(544>' !/'75440<

''!!'-)'?@3?3 :-)8)(!&#(8)''# !   ) &' !#  !# ' -    #'# 6"#?

 ' '    )&=  )'"# .' #  !# 'A  2:( 544><

)('!)&!' !!#7:''!.! B<

)!"'#!0@46?#'8CA!)'"#?



1232415440  $313$  

# )$ 1 ($ #'&( )( %$ &#)$ )($



9? #7:'?

5? .!B?

3? !")'"#8&.'!"'#!0@46?

2? 6"  &' !  -D &(' 6"  '  &#' E' !  !# ! 34 : !=  '6' &= ! 7 6#!# FCGHC6-; ;442  I &(!"'=!!' &7 6"#"' J '? >5  !   6#!#   7 6#!# ! 90:544@F +I<"#"!!'!- "'6' ".!&('&'A'!'!"!'<!' E' !#  7 6#!# & ( &'  & ( #'- J !' ! )'? 25  +?  &#' E' '  &=  & ! ' (-#""".!&( !('E':'8)(?

 A66=  #!'M       + K L #    &6"!&#'E'''6#J&'&A66







1232415440