Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/74/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/74/2008 Generato dall'IA

Statute Regulation of Hazardous Materials Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenge

Numero d'incarto ATAS/74/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought to enjoin the enforcement of a statute regulating the storage and handling of hazardous materials, asserting the law was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad as applied to their operations, which involved storing a substantial quantity of regulated material, differing from other facilities in volume and configuration. The court held that the statute's requirements, particularly regarding separation distances and facility design, were sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice of prohibited conduct, rejecting the vagueness challenge, and determined that the statute's broad scope was a legitimate exercise of the police power to protect public safety concerning dangerous substances, thereby denying injunctive relief.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute Regulation of Hazardous Materials Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenge: The court held that the statute's requirements, particularly regarding separation distances and facility design, were sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice of prohibited conduct, rejecting the vagueness challenge, and determined that the statute's broad scope was a legitimate exercise of the police power to protect public safety concerning dangerous substances, thereby denying injunctive relief.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sostanze pericolose esecuzione esercizio di poteri d’imperio minaccia per la sicurezza pubblica protezione del possesso potenza protettrice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Generato dall'IA
A/3832/2006
Regulations Upheld Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenges
A/1637/2003
Statutory Validity and Vagueness Challenge
A/3120/2006
Statutory Vagueness Challenge to Regulatory Statute
A/893/2004
Statute and Regulation Challenge Based on Free Speech and Due Process
A/1465/2003
Statutory Interpretation and Constitutional Challenge to Regulatory Statute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



             !

""#

$% "&%' (' $# %"(# ('#

()*+  ,  - ./ ! 



   ! "#  $ %%&



&%

''   (   !#%)  & ! *%  +, "" )- 



           

   "1.1"   !  %44 & 51&6%1223(77 &(4 8 " 4%9: ;%*&&(44 & 55* &1223,

%%" 02&6%1223%!<( &&% 4% "  % 6!3)6%1223,

%!4( -!6%1223,

%% %%%&12!6%1223+= &%& %% %%,

&&+( ) &4%%&%&% &%%&%>%%? 8%&@AB5 ;B



" (# 0 '# "&%' (' $# %"(# ('#

5B %&%&% &%%,

1B >%?,

0B  &+4%!%&C%& &,

/B 7%  4%&    +D 4)& 7%% %% &%  4%!& %%E&   !   02 *% 9  & 7 &  4%9  % 6 7!!% 8#=F G%=7+ --22/  ;4%) %%& 9%% & 46 7%!& H %&B @1      7!!% %  % 6 7!!%  53* 122I8 ';,! %%% &  +% & 7& >4%)&4%&% C&%%%&& %,  & E&% %!  % 6 7!!% 4% )  4&  4% )  !&% + H  &   (%&B /1  'B  4%!& %%E& &  4 9  4   %%& )+!>4%) )&E&%* &<() B  C%77 9%  %! &       '%# J K !%       

 4  7%  4%!& %%E& & & 7 ! H 4%&     +D #%!&% & (&&<(! 4%C%77



./011.1223