Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/720/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/720/2007 Generato dall'IA

Contractual Guarantee Validity and Damage Calculation Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/720/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The initial appeal concerned a dispute over a contractual obligation, where the appellant sought to reverse a judgment predicated on the trial court's application of a specific statutory provision regarding the enforceability of a guarantee agreement. The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the statutory requirements for the guarantee's validity were met, specifically referencing established precedents concerning the necessary element of consideration as reflected in the underlying transaction documents. A subsequent appellate action addressed a related claim regarding the calculation of damages, where the court affirmed the lower court's use of a particular market valuation method, finding it consistent with the contract terms and prevailing industry standards for assessing the loss suffered by the non-breaching party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Guarantee Validity and Damage Calculation Appeal: The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the statutory requirements for the guarantee's validity were met, specifically referencing established precedents concerning the necessary element of consideration as reflected in the underlying transaction documents. A subsequent appellate action addressed a related claim regarding the calculation of damages, where the court affirmed the lower court's use of a particular market valuation method, finding it consistent with the contract terms and prevailing industry standards for assessing the loss suffered by the non-breaching party.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità del contratto calcolo del danno nozione di decisione singoli accordi controversia commerciale clausola di garanzia di effettività

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The provision is cited for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
A/1920/2006
Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute
A/2440/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Appeal
A/93/2005
Contract Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute Affirmed
C/10827/2004
Contract Interpretation and Damages Appeal
A/2056/2004
Contract Termination and Damages Calculation Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

           '()*+'*,,- !'.*,'*,,.

!

 ! !"    " 

/0 +  *, 1  *,,. 



 !"  ! 

 !# !" !$%& "%  !'"%   

%

(    )    )  !%% "7  !$% *$+$%,--./ 0

(    )    )  + "+)! &  1"2%33443 ) 

    5 '36  

            !" #$  %   &

  98,  

 #!

3<  =+!%  9. $%!* 944;  .>! 1!*  *  $!> %  $"  &   !  "  3?:: % "3?:3!" % :=3??.<

9< )177. =+!%$"%" * $!>% " $%+$!%" & $"&@$7!"$ % !+$ ! <

-<  =+!%  & % & "7%7  -3 %* 944; %  "%" %! '77 * "94&!*944;$A"% $%+<

,< &%+%  * "%$! %%5 !  $$> ( %%%%$$"%& +"+  )!  '$%% %5$ %!+ 3;'4-37< 7!"!% B 'A B  %%  3? 7"& 9446  %% 7 %<   ! %*""7 '$%% *$+ 39'4:37< 34  !!%  '%"  7  & $>  %% !C! 7 % !%% !$% *$+B/1 ;! 9446 #<$%% %!"!!% !+'">&B ,'?-. 7< ;4 &  %"C%  =5' !!%  &    -4!9446 %% >7 %<

:< -&%.!9446 * "!!5"AA#"$A 5*$%+77%"<

;< 9:!9446 ! %! * " "   !$%  * $+<  '% "+!% "" '  &   '& %&% $% A#"$A%5$$" $ * "<

6< )"%"+ "B=+<

 "!

3< '%<9: 7" "*$+ $"&@$7 &&&%%& %" 36 "!*3??-D(E%"&+ 3=&9444>+$"   &<5=%% $ F $%% %B$%+D%<399%39-   &# E =+   &!$"%% '%<6-<3 7" " $"&@ $7  9: = 3?.9 DE % B >&  *

    8,-9:8944; -8,  

%  $3G%944- %$>5'77  "%"%!D%<3,9 EA"% '77$%+*  "  "$%% "%!"$=+  &<

9< )'%<99(D&%&+ $3=&9444E  &  $%%  % 5 %  !+ % $%+" 7!"!% A%<39939-3,3%3,9 H%<-B: ('$$5% $+!%%B%7"D<3E<15=%$%%  %B$%+$ B 77"%$%% %+!%"  &  * $+ A%% "&%!%  !!%  & %  $%% %+!%" & *$+A%%"&%!% !!%  !+D7<%<9,(E<=% B  $%%  % % B '&  * $+ A%%  !!%     !+  %"C%   !!%  & D ( 39.  9-4H (39?,,,E<

 F$>  =+  $!> %   "  $%+ $ !%"  $%%  % 5 %  !+ $  ! <  % $%% % F $%   !+  : = 3??. F% $%  -3%*944; %B5=+!%  &% &A"%<

-< )  7!%   !  $  !!%  & '$%% % '%% 9.'4.97<34D3;'4-37<I39'4:37<E<% & &&%  " 5!!% !+ ' !%%  ,'?-. 7<  5  %"C%  =5'B '%"  7  &< !  $ '$%% %!"$ % !+ 9-'3,,7<34<  %BA#"$!! 33':697<4: 7<D9-'3,,7<347<J9E<

,< 7!"!% B  =$  $  = "%!% $  $%+ =5'!!% %7% $%% %  !=% &"*""7 %%$%% %B %"C%!$% !%% #< %"C%%"%A!!!"+'%<39 ' $"&@$7&&&%%& %"  3. & 3?., D 9E    %A "+!%  # % $" D ($*"-;849 3.=%944-E<

:<  "!!%   $K  $"  "%% +%% D%< 6- < 9  % .?0<3 $"  !%%& 39$%!*3?.:E<



LLL

    8,-9:8944; ,8,  

  "!#  ! !"    " 

3< &%(    )    )  +"+   ) !  B %7"  !$%    $"&@ $7 M 3?.;99?844443  !!  33':69 7< 4: B      !$% *$+M  7&   !   5  %"C% !$%    "% >-3%*944;=5'!!% %7%<

9< F@ !%%5 *<

-< %5$" %+%%<

,< 7!  $%   5F $&% 7!  %  $"% C%   "  -4 = >  %7% $>  * 7" " D)1NO175;;44,  E$& !%>  % $*7!"!%A%<.9 7" " *7" " 36 = 944: D (EH  !"!   %  5   !%7 % !@ $&%$%+% % ! %H % C%  "  * 7" " $ & $%  $ & "%5 A  %  '%< ,9  (<  $"% C% %  $>  $  %&5"!!!@ $& &%C%=%B'&<  +77>  " %J          0  ) @   

$7! $"%C%%%7"A$%5FBF777" " $+77

    8,-9:8944;