Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/687/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/687/2007 Generato dall'IA

Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/687/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned a dispute over the enforceability of a restrictive covenant concerning the use of certain property, specifically challenging whether the covenant was properly executed and whether subsequent conduct invalidated its enforcement. The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute: The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione restrizioni per effetto contratto di possesso oggetto della lite titolo esecutivo di rigetto servitù di limitazione di costruzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
A/179/2006
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Dispute
A/2172/2004
Covenant Enforcement Validity Dispute
A/2383/2006
Restrictive Covenant Interpretation and Enforcement
A/228/2004
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Despite Neighborhood Change
A/683/2004
Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Against Commercial Use

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

           #$%&#'%%( )#*$(#'%%(

)

 )  )    

+  '

" ,& -" '%%( 



 !"#$#% &'"("' ( )*    



(

++   , ))      (!" -./0 '(1$2#$## #%



                   !"   "

   6$3%6  

))  . )

 ' "  $2 78 $55/ ,++     , )) 6     96':  ;  (<" =   96':  (;'"("''((7 >?  @  < (('((0

  ,(((( '( <A(      "(" (B"  ! ( ( ( $C78$55/0

( "'' $4<"8$55/D'7 ( #!$55/0

 "' #$8$55/,(!"(=,8B(" '  ( 8("0

,8(" =  "(!   >(  ( E'> ' "(  / ! $55/86!F!D " ( %578$55/(8(" ! ((= ('""!(<>'"" (8( >" ''8GA '"  0

'' $%!$55/,  >"!(0

 ' '  $. ! $55/  '( ( "(" <!" >   "(( A " = 7A>( 8B("H

 /)   )

 B "(!'"((!(:92CH#(HGH$;0

 "''('8(<,B7( ,':  B  "   %5 7 > 8(  (<( 9(H C5    <" "   '(A""  ( 6': ;0

' "<E"''('F('A""8  <!7( (((  " ,!'FG!( ,A9<H(#C  '"  !((866': ;0

  " !!( =    !   !!( ( E'( >,(!B(!  !G7"A!(<""'!7 (8(9(#/ ;0

, ,':  "  "(" (<"  ! (  (  (  $C 78$55/ (> "'( $/788(="G" !G$2 <"8("(( :'(" $C<"8$55/0



345.3$55/  6%3%6    ,(    "(" '("  (  $4 <"8 $55/  >  (  (( ,'0

 ' ">(   ( 8B '   ( 8("  ( ,"A( <!7!(< ,!'FG!(0

,  8( , '  > ,!'FG(  ( = (!'  8 ! (H

  ) .  )  )    

"

#H "8B' ( 8("H

$H =''( ,"!!(H

%H <!  '(   >I '8( <!  (  '"( F(   "  %5 7 :  (<( ':  B <" " 9)GJKG<>CC551  ;'8 !(:  ( 'B<!"!(E(H4$ <" " B<" " #/ 7 $552 9 +;0  !"!   (  >   !(< ( !- '8('(A( ( ! (0 ( F(  "  B <" " ' 8 '(  ' 8 "(> E  (  ,(H 1$  +H  '"( F( (  ':  '  (8>"!!!- '8 8(F(7(=,8H  A<<L  '" (L         ) B)   

'<! '"(F(((<"E'(>I=I<<<" " 'A<<





345.3$55/