Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/67/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/67/2016 Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/67/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant filed a payment claim against two foundations but subsequently withdrew the claim in writing on January 8, 2016. Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber noted the withdrawal of the demand and ordered the case to be struck from the court roll, effectively concluding the proceedings initiated by the applicant's initial filing.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF; Claim Withdrawal and Case Dismissal: Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber noted the withdrawal of the demand and ordered the case to be struck from the court roll, effectively concluding the proceedings initiated by the applicant's initial filing.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
insinuazione del credito procedura di assicurazioni sociali soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione abbandono del procedimento per truffa ordine di pagamento ritiro della domanda di esecuzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This provision is implicitly applied as the case is dismissed following the withdrawal of the demand, which corresponds to a simplified procedural disposition, although not explicitly named in the orders, the act of 'rayer la cause du rôle' following a withdrawal is a common procedural outcome.
Generato dall'IA
A/4852/2017
Claim Withdrawal in Social Insurance Dispute
A/803/2014
Payment Claim Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/691/2025
Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Dismissal of Case
A/27/2015
Claim Withdrawal and Dismissal
A/2665/2014
Withdrawal of Claim Against Pension Foundations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This provision is implicitly applied as the case is dismissed following the withdrawal of the demand, which corresponds to a simplified procedural disposition, although not explicitly named in the orders, the act of 'rayer la cause du rôle' following a withdrawal is a common procedural outcome.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/890/2015 ATAS/67/2016

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 21 janvier 2016 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A________, domicilié à GENÈVE, comparant avec demandeur élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MOLO Romolo

contre

FONDATION DE PREVOYANCE DU PERSONNEL DU GROUPE RINGIER, Brühlstrasse 5, ZOFINGEN et FONDATION SUISSE DES PARTENAIRES SOCIAUX POUR L'INSTITUTION SUPPLETIVE, p.a. Fondation instit. sup. LPP, Agence régionale de la Suisse romande, Passage St-François 12, LAUSANNE défenderesses

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente; Michael BIOT et Claudiane CORTHAY, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la demande en paiement du 16 mars 2015 de Monsieur A________ (ci-après : le demandeur) ; Attendu que par écriture du 8 janvier 2016, le demandeur a indiqué la retirer ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La présidente

Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/890/2015