Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/666/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/666/2014 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Repayment Obligation Withdrawn After Settlement

Numero d'incarto ATAS/666/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision by the supplementary benefits service refusing to waive the obligation to repay CHF 2,574, based on a lack of good faith, after the appellant proposed a repayment plan. During the appeal proceedings, the appellant subsequently informed the court that the full amount demanded had been settled with the service, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the case from its docket.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Repayment Obligation Withdrawn After Settlement: During the appeal proceedings, the appellant subsequently informed the court that the full amount demanded had been settled with the service, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the case from its docket.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione complementare ritiro a seguito di transazione obbligo di lealtà restituzione delle indennità di disoccupazione revoca della rendita d'invalidità azione di disconoscimento del debito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision implies cost implications, although not explicitly detailed in this snippet, standard procedure for final rulings often involves cost allocation based on procedural rules.
Generato dall'IA
A/2041/2017
Withdrawal of Appeals Regarding Repayment Obligations
A/4571/2018
Supplementary Benefits Repayment Demand Appeal Withdrawn Upon Favorable Reconsideration
A/985/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Repayment of Benefits
A/3857/2021
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Repayment Agreement
A/3667/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Repayment of Overpaid Benefits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision implies cost implications, although not explicitly detailed in this snippet, standard procedure for final rulings often involves cost allocation based on procedural rules.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/908/2014 ATAS/666/2014

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 3 juin 2014 2ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à GENEVE recourant

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, DEAS- intimé DGAS-SPC, sis Route de Chêne 54, GENEVE

Siégeant : Sabina MASCOTTO, Présidente; Christine BULLIARD MANGILI et Evelyne BOUCHAARA, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du service des prestations complémentaires (SPC) du 19 février 2014, refusant à Monsieur A______ (le recourant) la remise de l’obligation de rembourser la somme de CHF 2'574.- au motif que la condition de la bonne foi n’est pas réalisée ; Vu le courrier du 17 mars 2014 du recourant, adressé au SPC, proposant un plan de remboursement à raison de CHF 70.-/mois dès avril 2014 ; Vu le courrier du SPC du 24 mars 2014 annexant le courrier du recourant du 17 mars 2014 à la chambre de céans comme objet de sa compétence ; Vu la réponse du SPC du 29 avril 2014 concluant au rejet du recours et au maintien de la décision attaquée ; Vu les pièces produites ; Vu le courrier de la chambre de céans du 30 avril 2014 adressé au recourant, lui impartissant un délai au 16 mai 2014 pour consulter les pièces du dossier et faire part de ses remarques ; Vu le courrier de la chambre de céans du 20 mai 2014 adressé au SPC, lui impartissant un délai au 1er juin 2014 pour produire son dossier complet ; Vu le courrier du recourant du 21 mai 2014, et son annexe, informant la chambre de céans de son règlement au SPC du montant réclamé, soit CHF 2'574.-, et que le recours est annulé ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Irène PONCET Sabina MASCOTTO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/908/2014