Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/64/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/64/2009 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/64/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant, represented by counsel, filed an appeal against a decision on opposition from October 31, 2008, but subsequently informed the Cantonal Social Insurance Court via fax that the appeal was withdrawn. The Court noted this withdrawal and consequently struck the case from the register, effectively terminating the proceedings without ruling on the merits of the original dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal: The Court noted this withdrawal and consequently struck the case from the register, effectively terminating the proceedings without ruling on the merits of the original dispute.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca dell'opposizione procedura di assicurazioni sociali abbandono definitivo del procedimento azione in revoca divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato patrocinatore di controparte

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited because the court decided on court costs in the dispositive, even though the specific article regarding costs for a withdrawn appeal is not explicitly detailed in the final orders, Art. 66 LTF generally governs court costs.
Generato dall'IA
A/2285/2015
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/573/2006
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/841/2008
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/3780/2009
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/1027/2020
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited because the court decided on court costs in the dispositive, even though the specific article regarding costs for a withdrawn appeal is not explicitly detailed in the final orders, Art. 66 LTF generally governs court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4358/2008

### [ATAS/64/2009](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962494) du 27.01.2009 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2009/0000/ATAS_000064_2009_A_4358_2008.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE A/4358/2008 ATAS/64/2009 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES Chambre 2 du 27 janvier 2009

En la cause

Monsieur M__________, domicilié au PETIT-LANCY, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître REALINI Claudio · recourant

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis route de Chêne 54, GENEVE · intimé

Vu la décision sur opposition du 31 octobre 2008,

Vu le recours du 3 décembre 2008,

Vu la réponse du 19 décembre 2008,

Vu le fax du 26 janvier 2009 de Me REALINI, avocat du recourant, dans lequel il indique qu'il retire son recours;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait du recours.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Brigitte BABEL · La Présidente : Isabelle DUBOIS

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le