Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/555/2013 • CJ GE ATAS/555/2013 Generato dall'IA

Beneficiary Withdraws Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision

Numero d'incarto ATAS/555/2013
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court case involved an appeal filed by a beneficiary against a decision from the Supplementary Benefits Service (SPC) dated February 12, 2013, which had rejected her opposition to a prior SPC decision of October 25, 2012, as inadmissible due to being untimely. Following a hearing where the beneficiary appeared in person, she formally withdrew her appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 68 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Beneficiary Withdraws Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision: Following a hearing where the beneficiary appeared in person, she formally withdrew her appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca di prestazioni sociali prestazione complementare revoca dell'opposizione rinascita del diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione procedura di azione in materia di assicurazioni sociali beneficiario di rendita AI

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 68 al. 1 let. a LTF

This article is cited implicitly as the basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the conclusion of the case.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of costs, which is implicitly considered when the case is struck from the roll following withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/666/2013

### [ATAS/555/2013](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1968525) du 30.05.2013 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2013/0005/ATAS_000555_2013_A_666_2013.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE A/666/2013 ATAS/555/2013 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 30 mai 2013 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame Y__________, domiciliée au PETIT-LANCY · recourante contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, DSE-SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENEVE · intimé

Vu la décision du SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES (SPC) du 12 février 2013 déclarant l'opposition formée par Madame Y__________ (ci-après : la bénéficiaire) contre sa décision du 25 octobre 2012 irrecevable pour cause de tardiveté;

Vu le recours interjeté par la bénéficiaire le 22 février 2013;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 12 mars 2013;

Vu le complément au recours du 19 mars 2013;

Vu les écritures de l'intimé des 10 et 16 avril 2013;

Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties de ce jour;

Attendu qu'à l'issue de cette audience, la bénéficiaire des prestations a retiré son recours;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Marie-Catherine SECHAUD · La Présidente : Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le