Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/492/2017 • CJ GE ATAS/492/2017 Generato dall'IA

Insured Party Withdraws Appeal of Coverage Denial

Numero d'incarto ATAS/492/2017
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured party appealed an insurer's decision refusing coverage for an abdominal skin reduction and thigh lift following a prior opposition decision, but subsequently informed the court by letter that she was withdrawing the filing because she only intended to seek advice, not file a formal appeal; consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber acknowledged the withdrawal and struck the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insured Party Withdraws Appeal of Coverage Denial: An insured party appealed an insurer's decision refusing coverage for an abdominal skin reduction and thigh lift following a prior opposition decision, but subsequently informed the court by letter that she was withdrawing the filing because she only intended to seek advice, not file a formal appeal; consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber acknowledged the withdrawal and struck the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicuratore soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione revoca dell'opposizione riduzione dei premi dell'assicurazione malattie vertenza di assicurazione sociale riesame da parte dell'assicuratore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited for the implicit order regarding costs associated with the case resolution, as is standard practice when issuing a final decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/496/2017

### [ATAS/492/2017](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1973198) du 14.06.2017 ( LAMAL ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2017/0004/ATAS_000492_2017_A_496_2017.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/496/2017 ATAS/492/2017 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 14 juin 2017 4ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE · recourante

contre

CONCORDIA ASSURANCE SUISSE DE MALADIE ET ACCIDENTS SA, sise Bundesplatz 15, LUCERNE · intimée

Vu la décision sur opposition du 2 février 2017 de la Concordia assurance suisse de maladie et accidents SA (ci-après : l’assureur) refusant à Madame A______ (ci-après : l'assurée) la prise en charge des interventions de redrapage cutané abdominal et de cruroplastie ;

Vu le courrier du 13 février 2017 par lequel l'assurée demandait à la Cour de céans son point de vue, trouvant la décision injustifiée ;

Vu la réponse du 6 avril 2017 de l’assureur ;

Vu le courrier du 22 mai 2017 de l'assurée indiquant qu’elle retirait « son recours », qui n’en était pas un, car elle voulait seulement demander conseil ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Isabelle CASTILLO · La présidente Catherine TAPPONNIER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le