Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/460/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/460/2016 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Benefit Appeal Withdrawal Upon Concession

Numero d'incarto ATAS/460/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed an appeal against a decision concerning unemployment insurance benefits, but the opposing unemployment insurance fund subsequently agreed to the appellant's desired starting date for the benefit period, provided the appeal was withdrawn. Following this concession, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the docket.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Unemployment Insurance Benefit Appeal Withdrawal Upon Concession: Following this concession, the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the docket.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione concessione disoccupazione legittimazione a ricorrere sciopero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the final orders, this article governs the allocation of costs in the absence of an express ruling, which is standard practice when a case is withdrawn and struck from the roll, although the decision itself omits any cost order.
Generato dall'IA
A/725/2015
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawal
A/3432/2009
Unemployment Benefits Appeal Withdrawal
A/4244/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Unemployment Insurance Case
A/324/2018
Withdrawal of Unemployment Benefit Appeal
A/3702/2017
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the final orders, this article governs the allocation of costs in the absence of an express ruling, which is standard practice when a case is withdrawn and struck from the roll, although the decision itself omits any cost order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/847/2016 ATAS/460/2016

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 14 juin 2016 2ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié au PETIT-LANCY recourant

contre

CAISSE CANTONALE GENEVOISE DE CHOMAGE, sise rue intimée de Montbrillant 40, GENÈVE

Siégeant : Raphaël MARTIN, Président; Teresa SOARES et Christian PRALONG, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 10 février 2016, Vu le recours du 10 mars 2016, Vu les divers échanges d’écritures, Vu le fax du 6 juin 2016, par lequel la caisse cantonale genevoise de chômage (ciaprès : la caisse) indique qu’un courrier que le gestionnaire de contrôle interne a adressé le 27 mai 2016 au recourant doit être tenu pour nul et non avenu, et que, comme la caisse l’a indiqué dans son écriture du 26 mai 2016, elle consentira – sous-entendu dès le retrait du recours, par l’usage du conditionnel dicté par l’effet dévolutif attaché au recours – à l’ouverture du délai-cadre d’indemnisation au 18 décembre 2015 ; Vu le courrier du 8 juin 2016 par lequel Monsieur A______ déclare dès lors retirer son recours ; Qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait de recours et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Le président

Sylvie SCHNEWLIN Raphaël MARTIN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/847/2016