Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/399/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/399/2004 Generato dall'IA

Enforcement of Order Compelling Arbitration Based on Prior Award Under Contractual Mandate

Numero d'incarto ATAS/399/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A reviewing court considered whether an order compelling arbitration based on a prior arbitration award should be enforced, where the underlying contract contained a clause stipulating that any dispute regarding the award's scope or validity must be submitted to arbitration. The court reasoned that the contractual mandate for arbitration extends to disputes over the scope or validity of a prior award stemming from that contract, as the issue of arbitrability is itself a question for the arbitrator under the broad scope of the arbitration clause, thereby requiring enforcement of the order compelling arbitration.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Enforcement of Order Compelling Arbitration Based on Prior Award Under Contractual Mandate: The court reasoned that the contractual mandate for arbitration extends to disputes over the scope or validity of a prior award stemming from that contract, as the issue of arbitrability is itself a question for the arbitrator under the broad scope of the arbitration clause, thereby requiring enforcement of the order compelling arbitration.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità della clausola arbitrale autorizzazione all’esecuzione contratto di mandato compromettibilità gravi motivi potere di cognizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court fees.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

The court ordered the opposing party to be compensated for their costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

     

     !"# $%%!  "&& $%%!

'

( )(* *+*  (* +)

 $,  $%%!

"-  . /

  

   01111111111   ! "# # $  % & & '  (# &##  

 

+22) *+*  3(*4)*5))  & ) *+ , -. # #(

       

        /0/

*( * 2)

  &(##  # # & 2 5(.# /4416 755#   & 78

   &#-  # ; (      &(## >

  # & ?+ # /4416     & #&#'(  #   >

%# )  # &% &    & &# %55# & @ >

  +)2  )(* *+*  (* +)



6787   9  :77 7  3; <#$ +

?A &   &  # &  >

/A )   & @ >

 B55#- C  (#&  C

# DD E# $ E

 # 5 & ( F   #5#( G  # ## '7, 755# 5(&( &  #   B55

01230/441