Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/397/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/397/2005 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Family Allowances Moot Due to Subsequent Grant of Benefits

Numero d'incarto ATAS/397/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a decision by the family allowance fund denying benefits to his wife, arguing that since his own employment had moved to a different canton effective January 1, 2005, his family qualified for allowances under Federal Tribunal jurisprudence despite his wife still working in the original canton. The court declared the appeal moot because the fund subsequently issued a new decision on April 14, 2005, granting the family allowances to the wife retroactive to January 1, 2005, thereby satisfying the appellant's claims.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 162 LOJ; Appeal Regarding Family Allowances Moot Due to Subsequent Grant of Benefits: The court declared the appeal moot because the fund subsequently issued a new decision on April 14, 2005, granting the family allowances to the wife retroactive to January 1, 2005, thereby satisfying the appellant's claims.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assegno familiare diritto alle prestazioni caso di rigore coniugale diritti dello stato di famiglia ripartizione della rendita per coniugi acquisti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 162 LOJ
This provision is cited in the dispositive section as the basis for the decision made by the Court, specifically regarding the transitional provisions applied by the Cantonal Tribunal.
Generato dall'IA
A/2548/2005
Appeal Moot Due to Retroactive Allowance Grant
A/2541/2009
Appeal Moot Due to New Administrative Decision and Award of Legal Costs
A/1087/2004
Claimant v. Family Allowances Fund Regarding Retroactive Benefit Date
A/1089/2013
Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Fund Decision
A/2502/2022
Family Allowance Retroactive Payment Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 162 LOJ

This provision is cited in the dispositive section as the basis for the decision made by the Court, specifically regarding the transitional provisions applied by the Cantonal Tribunal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/898/2005

### [ATAS/397/2005](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1957951) du 10.05.2005 ( AF ) , SANS OBJET

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2005/0003/ATAS_000397_2005_A_898_2005.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/898/2005 ATAS/397/2005 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

2ème chambre du 10 mai 2005

En la cause

Monsieur A__________, · recourant

contre

FER-CIAM – CAISSE INTERPROFESSIONNELLE D’ALLOCATIONS FAMILIALES DE LA FEDERATION DES ENTREPRISES ROMANDES 98, rue de St-Jean à Genève · intimée

Vu la décision de la caisse refusant le versement d’allocations familiales à l’épouse du recourant, du 7 février 2005, et la décision sur opposition du 15 mars 2005 confirmant celle-ci ;

Vu le recours du 31 mars 2005, dans lequel le recourant expose que sa famille vit à Genève, où son épouse travaille, et que son activité à lui-même se déroule, depuis le 1er janvier 2005, dans le canton de Vaud et non plus à Genève, de sorte que son épouse a droit au versement des allocations en application de la jurisprudence du Tribunal fédéral des assurances ;

Vu la réponse de la caisse du 14 avril 2005, qui communique au Tribunal copie de la décision rendue le 14 avril 2005, accordant les allocations familiales à l’épouse du recourant depuis le 1er janvier 2005 ;

Attendu que cette décision rejoint pleinement les conclusions du recourant, de sorte que le recours devient sans objet.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Statuant

(conformément à la disposition transitoire de l’art. 162 LOJ)

Déclare le recours sans objet.

Raye la cause du rôle.

Le greffier: Pierre Ries · La présidente : Isabelle Dubois

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le