Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/395/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/395/2012 Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Insurance Arbitration

Numero d'incarto ATAS/395/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali ripartite
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant filed a payment claim against the defendants on December 14, 2011, but subsequently declared the withdrawal of this demand via a letter received on March 16, 2012, stipulating that each party would bear its own costs. Consequently, the Arbitral Tribunal of Insurance acknowledged the withdrawal of the case, ordered each party to bear half of the 50 franc fee (as the procedure is not free under cantonal law), and removed the case from its roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Insurance Arbitration: Consequently, the Arbitral Tribunal of Insurance acknowledged the withdrawal of the case, ordered each party to bear half of the 50 franc fee (as the procedure is not free under cantonal law), and removed the case from its roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arbitrato pagamento dell'emolumento ripartizione delle spese partecipazione alle spese dell'assicurato soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione insinuazione del credito
Generato dall'IA
A/4329/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Allocation in Insurance Arbitration
A/3751/2011
Insurance Arbitration Fee Allocation After Claim Withdrawal
A/3600/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Tribunal Cost Allocation in Insurance Arbitration
A/3714/2011
Insurance Payment Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Arbitration
A/125/2012
Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Insurance Arbitration

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal

Cited in the reasoning regarding the cost of the procedure, which was applied in the dispositive order concerning the emolument.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4319/2011

### [ATAS/395/2012](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1967172) du 26.03.2012 ( ARBIT ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2012/0003/ATAS_000395_2012_A_4319_2011.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4319/2011 ATAS/395/2012 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

du 26 mars 2012

En la cause

X_________ à Chêne-Bourg, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Dominique MAISSEN · demandeurs

contre

Y_________ à Martigny Z_________ à Martigny · défenderesses

Vu la demande en paiement de X_________ datée du 8 novembre 2011, déposée le 14 décembre 2011;

Attendu que, par courrier du 29 février 2012, mais reçu le 16 mars 2012, X________ a déclaré retirer sa demande, chacune des parties supportant ses frais;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte;

Que la procédure par-devant le Tribunal arbitral n'étant pas gratuite (cf. art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal), l'émolument de 50 fr., est mis à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune;

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES :

Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

Met l'émolument de 50 fr. à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Florence SCHMUTZ · La présidente Maya CRAMER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le