Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/387/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/387/2012 Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration

Numero d'incarto ATAS/387/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali ripartite
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant initiated payment proceedings against the defendant on December 9, 2011, but subsequently withdrew the claim via correspondence received on March 16, 2012, with each party agreeing to bear their own costs. The Arbitral Tribunal for Insurance accepted the withdrawal of the claim, struck the case from the roll, and, because the procedure was not free, imposed a fee of 50 Swiss Francs to be split equally between both parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claim Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration: The Arbitral Tribunal for Insurance accepted the withdrawal of the claim, struck the case from the roll, and, because the procedure was not free, imposed a fee of 50 Swiss Francs to be split equally between both parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arbitrato pagamento dell'emolumento indennità assicurativa soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione insinuazione del credito inadempimento dell'assicuratore
Generato dall'IA
A/3726/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration
A/1606/2012
Claimant Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration
A/1326/2012
Claimant Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration
A/4064/2011
Claimant Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration
A/3568/2011
Plaintiff Withdrawal and Fee Imposition in Insurance Arbitration

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal

This article justifies the decision to charge a fee to the parties, as mentioned in order 2.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4213/2011 ATAS/387/2012

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

du 23 mars 2012

En la cause

X___________ à Chêne-Bourg, comparant avec élection de demandeurs domicile en l'étude de Maître MAISSEN Dominique

contre

Y___________ à Martigny défenderesse

Siégeant : Maya CRAMER, Présidente

- 2/2 -

Vu la demande en paiement déposée par X__________ en date du 9 décembre 2011 ;

Attendu que par courrier daté du 29 février 2012, mais reçu le 16 mars 2012, X___________ a déclaré retirer sa demande, chacune des parties supportant ses frais ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte ;

Que la procédure par-devant le Tribunal arbitral n'étant pas gratuite (cf. art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal), un émolument de 50 fr., sera mis à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune ;

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES :

1. Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

2. Met un émolument de 50 fr. à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune.

3. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La présidente

Florence SCHMUTZ Maya CRAMER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4213/2011