Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/386/2012 • CJ GE ATAS/386/2012 Generato dall'IA

Claimant's Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Allocation of Arbitration Fees

Numero d'incarto ATAS/386/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali ripartite
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant filed a payment claim against the defendant, but subsequently withdrew the claim via a letter received by the court on March 16, 2012, with both parties agreeing to bear their own costs. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal and, noting that the arbitration procedure was not free of charge according to cantonal law, ordered each party to pay half of a 50 franc fee, and subsequently removed the case from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant's Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Allocation of Arbitration Fees: The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal and, noting that the arbitration procedure was not free of charge according to cantonal law, ordered each party to pay half of a 50 franc fee, and subsequently removed the case from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pagamento dell'emolumento arbitrato ritiro delle conclusioni civili ripartizione delle spese credito in esecuzione pagamento a contanti del saldo
Generato dall'IA
A/272/2012
Withdrawal of Payment Claim and Allocation of Arbitral Fees
A/4215/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Allocation in Arbitration
A/249/2012
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Allocation in Arbitration
A/4217/2011
Claim Withdrawal and Fee Allocation in Arbitration
A/1374/2012
Claim Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Arbitration

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal

Cited to impose the procedure fee (émolument) on the parties.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4212/2011

### [ATAS/386/2012](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1967163) du 23.03.2012 ( ARBIT ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2012/0003/ATAS_000386_2012_A_4212_2011.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4212/2011 ATAS/386/2012 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

du 23 mars 2012

En la cause

X__________ à Chêne-Bourg, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MAISSEN Dominique · demandeurs

contre

Y__________ à Martigny · défenderesse

Vu la demande en paiement déposée par X_________ en date du 9 décembre 2011 ;

Attendu que par courrier daté du 29 février 2012, mais reçu le 16 mars 2012, X__________ a déclaré retirer sa demande, chacune des parties supportant ses frais ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte ;

Que la procédure par-devant le Tribunal arbitral n'étant pas gratuite (cf. art. 46 de la loi cantonal d'application de LAMal du 29 mai 1997- LaLAMal), un émolument de 50 fr., sera mis à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune ;

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES :

Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

Met un émolument de 50 fr. à la charge des parties à raison de la moitié chacune.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Florence SCHMUTZ · La présidente Maya CRAMER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le