Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/386/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/386/2007 Generato dall'IA

Appeal on Statutory Disclosure Liability Based on Deceptive Impression

Numero d'incarto ATAS/386/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging the application of a statute imposing liability for damages resulting from the failure to disclose certain information during a transaction, where the lower court found liability based on the misleading nature of the disclosure, even though all specific required elements were technically provided. The court reasoned that the statute's purpose is to prevent transactions induced by fraudulent or incomplete presentations, and thus the finding of liability was justified because the overall effect of the disclosure was deceptive, violating the spirit and intent of the law, despite a literal reading potentially suggesting compliance.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

; LOI FÉDÉRALE SUR L'ASSURANCE-ACCIDENTS ; ACCIDENT ANODIN ; ACCIDENT DE PEU DE GRAVITÉ ; AA ; DOMMAGE MATÉRIEL ; TRAITEMENT DES SUITES D'UN ACCIDENT ; SOINS MÉDICAUX ; LUNETTES ; REMBOURSEMENT DE FRAIS(ASSURANCE) ; CONSULTATION(EN GÉNÉRAL) | LAA12

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
comunicazione dei dati responsabilità del revisore marchi ingannevoli danno patrimoniale procurato con astuzia responsabilità per atto illecito natura dell'infrazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of court costs to the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
A/1562/2003
Statutory Interpretation on Document Disclosure
A/492/2005
Liability for Misrepresentation Under Property Disclosure Statute
A/1489/2002
Appeal of Fraudulent Misrepresentation Finding Based on Insufficient Proof of Intent
C/13537/2017
Appeal Regarding Contract Validity Based on Lesion, Deceit, and Error
A/358/2004
Statutory Disclosure Requirement Retroactivity Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs to the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

           "#$%&#&''$ ""#()*#&''$

"

  +", "++",  ""+  ",

-.  & ! %' / &''$ 



 !"# $%&$'( )



)

*    *+    * )"# +  * ,)'-./")))$ 0&&%   



              !   !

   3%143  

"+ + " 

   536'  )7 #))  8##9 !+!")# :'!/;"- )!#<))8-)"))!))  "! 69 6' !  *     * +    *+  *536'* 7 =+9)/)< 6)!)!$>("8%&&0?

  9) /")   ) + 8 < ))  = ! 8 69  - )  ! -/ ! ) =+ ))") + #)# # "=+<)))))#)#!""-#?

+!)!%>("8%&&0+99)!+"69)6(<*  !#)!+!)8-)?

+ )  ! !  *  !)# ! @& ("8 %&&0  A6= =  '  6") ! )  )##6/# < !A 6 <  *  6 (36()6!/-B)!))"-#9)=+ ))")+()#)## =)<=* #6!6#-)(?

+  ) #-") =  )  6)# !  !"! )  !'  )#"#!!)=8)?

 6 !# ! %2 !#"8 %&&0   *   9"# =+  6() 6 6!  /-  ( ! ))    )) /C  "#! ! %D ("8%&&0?

 ) < +66) ! )   *   9"#  !#  %E :( %&&2   ")9 =  "6") ! )) <  /- !  *  =  ! #6#))))") =+)6?

!!%@9#(%&&2 )(!=6/-!  9 ) !') =+ ) !"8 =  *  A-  )) "#!)?

!#6!>"%&&2 * ):)!))) =6#()))"6")66/-!9?

#)#)")$%"%&&2 )6)9"#= #))-!#<:-?







12$%1%&&2  3@143   + "+ +  

9"#")<+)FE0F$)F /FE!-(G-) :! ! %% ("8 $>4$ 57   8 ) !   H) )= !)))6#(<+)FE0!9#!# 6) -## ! !) !   ! 0 )8 %&&& 5 7 = ) )(<9#!#G3!)!%&"$>D$5 7?

"6#)6:-!!G6')#)8?

6)-##!!)!536' 7 )# (-$:(%&&@ )668+6'?

 ):)#!9")!#6#(6 )(8?

+A)"! 6))!+!+!))))") "#!   ", A   !""- ")#   9 ! )6)   !")# :'   ) !+(!)# ) ! (()  )  !")# 6 )))<+)#-)#=)6"6))?

/!6))+)(=+<)!)?

+6)!""-")#)!"#=+)#6  !) A 8:) = "6)  "6/-=")  9)")   6) ! 6  ) =  9 ! "6") ! ))  66 )= ) 6)/' !)  ) 6  /- =   # 6 #)  ))")5)$% 7?

+ ) ") !  )A) !  =  8) !    +) 6  "6")!+8:)!""-# )=+6()I)"6#=+!) )!+)"6) 6)!+(##6#)) ))")?

+<+#(!)+6#)# )=+"6)!'6=))  +) 6 )#  "#!  )) )) +#)) 6 99)   6 (!)!#!""-")!))?

+99)!#-)-)))#6 #)) ))")?

6#=):)#F

F







12$%1%&&2  34143  

"  0  ,  +", "++",  ""+  ",

!

"  1.

$F #(8F

"! 1

%F :))F

@F )=6#!)-))F

4F 9"  6) !  =G 6() 9"  )  6#) I) !  !# ! @& : !'  )9) 6' ! 8 9#!# 5*/JC/9=0 0&&4  7 6(!")'!!) 68 9"#")A)FD%!9#!# 89#!#!$2 : %&&E 5 .7?  "#" !  !) !=    ")9 ) ",!6()6)-)!)!"!)?!) I) !#  8 9#!# 6 ( 6)  6 ( #)= A !) ! +)F 4%  .F  6#) I) )  6'  6 ! ) (=#""",!6( !()I):)<+(F  -99'  #!)N             KL M 8*     

69"!6#)I)))9#A6)=G<G999#!# !)#68=6-99





12$%1%&&2