Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/372/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/372/2007 Generato dall'IA

Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/372/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a judgment upholding a tax assessment, arguing that the taxing authority miscalculated the value of intangible assets, specifically goodwill, when valuing the business for property tax purposes, contending that the required use of a specific valuation method yielded an arbitrary and excessive result. The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute: The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
stima della sostanza aziendale tassazioni fiscali bene immateriale goodwill valore litigioso imposta immobiliare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
A/1524/2001
Tax Valuation Dispute Over Asset Value
A/4319/2006
Tax Assessment Valuation Dispute and Procedural Remedies
A/3076/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed Against Petitioner
A/414/2004
Taxpayer Challenge to Business Asset Valuation Methodology Upheld
A/3712/2006
Tax Assessment Upheld on Related-Party Asset Sale Below Market Value

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

           &'()&*++, &-.*&*++.



#  /#   #  

01  2 % - 3  *++.        !" # !    ! !" $ %& !'()"(  !*"(  +(         (   &&, &  "7  * &     &-  & *  &      .  / 0) &(%123   4  $  - ()  !56 &  

              ! "# $% % 

  58:  

 4 

<= >1!( 5;>)566;9?!@!0  0 '!?( .%'? /'" )  !" <9:6("<9A9!" ( 59><9B2=

5= &@77A  '(7 >1!('"("  "(C'( D*"(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E '7D'@ "'C (!1=

2=  '"  ) ( ) "7(7  9 ! 566; (  >1!(  0 '!?("("(!<;!566; 0 " 'D%'?  !((F(7"=

A=  0 "(" '(! ((( '")E '('"((( "7 '( !!D !(( )D (!1((59><9B2( 9!566;=

A= *((!"' 0 "'! *"(07()(G

&    55 ! 566;   &&  ,   &   * &        & -  &  *  &          .  / ((( F D ! (77" '<>)<99A!(( ) !"'( <22*B237=A:("H(9!566;!'=

"( *C(( !'( )  (( &% (!' ( !'(D ! ()""'(!(  *(( '0D ' <9B2=  * ' ( ' "(" ! F (())77(""=

& !   0  "     '   <: )!0 566; '"")()"( *77(("( <>)<9B: 2< I( <9B: ( ) !0"  <B (0 <9B: F  !   '(( ( 9;27=9:!'( @?D'(=

 !  D( F   "(" 77" '?  ' 7 ( (  $ & $  J% . ) ==  .&&&/& D(7"")F-    &&  *&& D%!H!(7""C%'?  && & &     & & &&  #&=56>( 566;&4&&- "")K'(( 0'1   ' '"(" ( * "1!( (7"" '?  4  $

    89:38566; 28:  

   < >) 566; "(( '"" D *(' , &  .&&&/  )( 7"  '  @1   1(   '")E '7=

& <9>566;4  $  7!"D )  ! "(( 3A5*B;97=;:(( L<83<;658 ( <6*55:7<:' 0'1 L523A:6("H(9!566; !'=

B=  !(("("(!C'(> ( D"D*F "7( *0)( *5)566BH(( ((0=

:= *0 *0>(  "7C""("1 "F>1=



  

<= *(=5: 7" "0'1 '")E'7 )))(() (" <B "!0<992.-/(")1 <>)5666?1'"   )=D>(( ' M '(( (F'(1.(=<55(<52   )% / >1   )!'"(( *(=B2=< 7" " '")E '7  5: > <935 ./ ( F ?)  0 (  '<I(5662 ('?D*77  "("(!.(=<A5 /C"( *77'(10  "  "'(( "(!"'>1  )=

5= &*(=55-.)()1 '<>)5666/  )  '((  ( D (  !1 ( '(1" 7!"!( C(=<55<52<A<(<A5 N(=2F: -*''D( '1!((F(7".=</=@D>('((  (F'(1' F 77"('(( (1!("  )  0 '1 C(( ")(!(  !!(  ) (  '(( (1!(" ) 0'1C((")(!( !!(  !1.7=(=5A-/=>( F  '((  ( ( F *)  0 '1 C((  !!(     !1  ("H(   !!(  ) . - <53  526N -<59AAA/=

2=  M'?  >1  '!? (  " ( C '(   D* "(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E'7 D ' @  "'C (  !1=  ( '(( ( M

    89:38566; A8:  

'( !159><9B2 M('(9!566; (FD >1!(  )( )C"(=

A= &  !( ' (  '(( D '  !  (  3:5*99A7=36.3A5*B;97=;:O<6*55:7=<:/= D' !  (  <22*B23 7= A:=  ("H( ( ">F "(" " '  (((  '")E "7 =  !  (FC%"'!((  A5;*A9B 7= A6 .3:5*99A 7=36 G5/ (  !   ( ;;*3;9 7= 56 .<22*B237=A: G 5/  ( D *(  !  D ( F  C%"'  !(( 2:9*;537=56=

:= 7!"!( F  >'  '  > "(!( '  '(1 >D*!!( (7( '(( (  !>( )"0""7 (('(( (F ("H(!'( !(( %= ("H(("(C!!!"1*(=<5 * '")E'7)))(() ("  <3 ) <93A . 5/    (C "1!(  % ( '" . -'0"2;865 <3>(5662/=

;=  "!!(   'K  '"  "(( 1(( .(= B2 = 5  ( 39$=< '"  !(() <5'(!0<93:/=

    89:38566; :8:  

  5 4   /#   #  

%

67 8 00 9  :        ; < 2,* $=

<= )(  4  $   F (7"  !'(   !! 2:9*;537=56F &&,  & * &     &-  &  *  &          .  /  7)   !   D  ("H( !'(     "( ?9!566;>D*!!( (7(=

5= ME !((D 0=

2= 7!  '(   DM ')( 7!  (  '"( H(   "  26 > ?  (7( '?  0 7" " .&@PQ@7D;;66A  /') !(?  ( '07!"!(C(=35 7" " 07" " <B > 566: . -/N  !"!   (  D   !(7 ( !E ')('(1( ( ! (N ( H(  "  0 7" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(D C  (  *(= A5  -=  '"( H( (  '?  '  ()D"!!!E ') )(H(>(F*)=  177?  " (G     % R 4  

'7! '"(H(((7"C'(DMFM777" " '177

    89:38566;