Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/365/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/365/2005 Generato dall'IA

Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use

Numero d'incarto ATAS/365/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a lower court's grant of summary judgment in a dispute concerning the scope of an easement, where the easement holder sought to expand its use beyond the original prescriptive period grant to accommodate significantly larger and more frequent loads than originally contemplated. The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use: The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servitù potere di cognizione fondo agricolo uso commerciale portata geografica dell'infrazione estensione dell'espropriazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is mentioned in order 2.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               %&'%'(() "%*+,%'((,

 "

 "  -"   - - 

'.  /0  $ *  '((, 



1"  " ""  " !  &#  !"#$%



'"#

23333333333   (#





          ! "  #$

   )*+,)  

&#'-#'-".- #"/0# &"1'00'-"-'$2 3-#*4425

0#' #5

  (--"    (# 0#''  0# 36&"  #-7  0#&-8# -"  $9 '&7# *442 1##:"  0-'  $,  &7# *442  # "#""-'(--""1'#'#0#-1-"#"-';( #-#*44<5

-'&0#"-'0#'0#"-&#"*9#-*44<5

 1'#-"#"#0#"-.-0# '-".&'"""'" =*9#- *44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4A'-"&'"""'"("# %3'#&'- '&0"# %3'#B"## 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-% (-#-*44<5

CDDDDDDDDDD1E"66 "0#-7''".1')0-&"1 &-" &'"""'""-&& -"&"/-6-71##:" #-7""-"# &- 5

1-'-"1" #-#"'#.-&""#&%0#' #@

  - " 1  "  -"   - - 

$ 5//   6

7/8   9  6   5: ;+' <=

$@ ' " %  F  G    G      .   &'"""'"=*9#-*44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4"0'##:"# # 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-%(-#-*44<@

*@ '"%HDDDDDDDDDDG .11E66@

,@ 1E'&"".7'-@

2@ -" .1   ')0-&" 1 &-"   "'"-"    #  -" -&& -"&"/-6-70# "##:"""-"#&- @

<@ -".0#' #"6#"-"@

  ),+,)   9@ 00-"-'1#"@<4 -('#&0#"-.10"('#&# #'#'"#0# "##:" -,43'#8'"-(-"-'0#0- #'&& #  #-7(  ##GI-J#'(.-99442   "#'-/&0-#@ -0":"#0#''6 @& &'-#'-"K B--.#/"&". --'#'#" -#'7"-#-"0  --'"". 57B/0'#0'#.&'"-(-"-&0''-#&#"" "# --'5B0'#"#-6"#''#0# ""@G-& &'-# '"-" 0  "#'-  &" & #  ' ""# B 7B " B -)  #-7(  ##0'##0"##&"-8###'#.1- # ##-##7@& &'-##'#&"-'#'#&'E  0# .- #'" 3'-" -- .   --' "".  " 1'00  . " /0 - #'#"A#"@$,*$49"$4?B@





 6#((-#K  # -"K     -## G 7G 







'0-'('#&0# "##:""'"-(- /0#"---.1%1((-(  # #'-0#6#((