Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/36/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/36/2014 Generato dall'IA

Association v. Health Insurance Company (Claim Withdrawal and Mootness)

Numero d'incarto ATAS/36/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An association filed a payment claim against a health insurance company, but subsequently requested the case be struck from the record because the defendant agreed to settle the disputed amounts based on a transactional agreement reached with the state covering specific years. The arbitral tribunal, finding no impediment to the requested withdrawal, declared the claim moot and dismissed the case, ruling that the judicial fees, fixed at 150 Swiss francs, must be borne by the claimant as per their undertaking, consistent with the principle that the arbitration procedure is not free.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 46 de la loi cantonale d'application de la LAMal du 29 mai 1997, Article 1, point 2; Association v. Health Insurance Company (Claim Withdrawal and Mootness): The arbitral tribunal, finding no impediment to the requested withdrawal, declared the claim moot and dismissed the case, ruling that the judicial fees, fixed at 150 Swiss francs, must be borne by the claimant as per their undertaking, consistent with the principle that the arbitration procedure is not free.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
federazione delle casse convenzione arbitrale indicazioni sulla salute compagnia d'assicurazioni credito contestato assicurazione malattia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 46 de la loi cantonale d'application de la LAMal du 29 mai 1997
This article, concerning the costs of the arbitration procedure, is mentioned in the considerations, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) regarding costs or fees.
Article 1, point 2
This point (implied by numbering in the dispositive) imposes the judicial fee, based on the agreement and the nature of the procedure.
Generato dall'IA
A/474/2013
Association v. Health Insurance Company (Withdrawal and Mootness)
A/483/2013
Claimant Association v. Health Insurance Company (Judicial Fees Upon Withdrawal)
A/198/2013
Association v. Health Insurer (Case Withdrawal and Costs)
A/195/2013
Association v. Health Insurance Company (Withdrawal and Settlement)
A/192/2013
Association v. Health Insurance Mutual (Mootness and Cost Allocation)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 46 de la loi cantonale d'application de la LAMal du 29 mai 1997

This article, concerning the costs of the arbitration procedure, is mentioned in the considerations, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) regarding costs or fees.

Article 1, point 2

This point (implied by numbering in the dispositive) imposes the judicial fee, based on the agreement and the nature of the procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/482/2013 ATAS/36/2014

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

du 9 janvier 2014

En la cause

ASSOCIATION X__________, sise à MEYRIN, comparant avec demanderesse élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître PROST Philippe

contre

PHILOS ASSURANCE MALADIE SA, Service juridique, sise rue défenderesse des Cèdres 5, MARTIGNY

Siégeant : Jean-Louis BERARDI, Président suppléant

- 2/2 -

Vu la demande en paiement déposée le 8 février 2013 ; l’audience de conciliation du 26 avril 2013 ; la lettre du 6 novembre 2013 (transmise pour information à la défenderesse le

13 novembre suivant), par laquelle la demanderesse a déclaré qu’elle retirait sa demande et requis la radiation de la cause du rôle, la défenderesse s’étant engagée à régler les montants litigieux, « selon l’accord transactionnel conclu avec l’Etat de Genève couvrant les années 2011 à 2013 » ; conformément à la volonté de parties, ledit retrait se faisait « dépens compensés », tandis que les frais de justice seraient supportés par la demanderesse.

et considérant qu’en l’occurrence, rien ne s’oppose à la radiation de la cause requise par la demanderesse, que la procédure devant le Tribunal arbitral n'est pas gratuite (cf. art. 46 de la loi cantonale d'application de la LAMal du 29 mai 1997), que les frais judiciaires, fixés à 150 fr., seront supportés par la demanderesse, conformément à son engagement.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL DES ASSURANCES

1. Déclare la demande sans objet et radie l’affaire du rôle.

2. Met un émolument judiciaire de 150 fr. à la charge de la demanderesse.

La greffière Le président suppléant

Florence SCHMUTZ Jean-Louis BERARDI

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/482/2013