Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/357/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/357/2016 Generato dall'IA

Insurer Collection Order Appeal Withdrawal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/357/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal lodged against a decision that partially upheld an objection to a collection order initiated by an insurer following a mainlevée decision, where the appellant subsequently informed the court by letter on April 27, 2016, that they were withdrawing their appeal. The court ruled, based on the relevant procedural law, that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the proceedings, therefore accepting the withdrawal and striking the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 89 al. 1 LPA, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insurer Collection Order Appeal Withdrawal: The court ruled, based on the relevant procedural law, that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the proceedings, therefore accepting the withdrawal and striking the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicuratore soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione censure procedurali ritiro della domanda legittimazione a ricorrere titolo esecutivo per i crediti non contestati

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 89 al. 1 LPA
This provision is cited in the reasoning to establish that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the procedure, which is the basis for the court's action in the dispositive.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision relates to the procedural cost allocation, although no explicit cost order is visible in the provided dispositive orders (1. and 2.), standard practice in such cases often implies costs, but based strictly on the rule, only explicitly cited provisions in the dispositive count. Since no costs article is cited in orders 1 or 2, this is excluded.
Generato dall'IA
A/2565/2010
Appeal Withdrawal Against Insurer
A/4180/2013
Appeal Withdrawal Against Insurer
A/2975/2010
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/945/2018
Insurer Coverage Denial Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
A/1787/2015
Appeal Withdrawn Regarding Health Insurance Debt Collection Order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 89 al. 1 LPA

This provision is cited in the reasoning to establish that the withdrawal of the appeal terminates the procedure, which is the basis for the court's action in the dispositive.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision relates to the procedural cost allocation, although no explicit cost order is visible in the provided dispositive orders (1. and 2.), standard practice in such cases often implies costs, but based strictly on the rule, only explicitly cited provisions in the dispositive count. Since no costs article is cited in orders 1 or 2, this is excluded.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/815/2016

### [ATAS/357/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1972193) du 09.05.2016 ( LAMAL ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0003/ATAS_000357_2016_A_815_2016.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/815/2016 ATAS/357/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 9 mai 2016 6ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A_____, domicilié à Cartigny · recourant

contre

AVANEX ASSURANCES SA, sise Zürichstrasse 130, Dübendorf · intimée

Vu en fait la décision de mainlevée de l’opposition à la poursuite n° 15214032 H du

28 décembre 2015 d’AVANEX assurances SA (ci-après : l’intimée) adressée à Monsieur A_____ (ci-après : le recourant) ;

Vu l’opposition du 25 janvier 2016 du recourant contre la décision du 28 décembre 2015 de l’intimée ;

Vu la décision du 2 février 2016 de l’intimée, admettant partiellement l’opposition du recourant ;

Vu le recours du 10 mars 2016 interjeté par le recourant contre la décision du

2 février 2016 auprès de la chambre des assurances sociales de la Cour de justice ;

Vu le courrier du 27 avril 2016 du recourant déclarant retirer son recours.

Attendu en droit que selon l'art. 89 al. 1 de la loi sur la procédure administrative, du 12 septembre 1985 (LPA ; RS E 5 10), le retrait du recours met fin à la procédure ;

Qu'en l'espèce le recours ayant été retiré, il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

\* \* \* \* \*

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Alicia PERRONE · La présidente Valérie MONTANI

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties ainsi qu’à l’Office fédéral de la santé publique par le greffe le