Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/345/2017 • CJ GE ATAS/345/2017 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal Following Fund's Annulment

Numero d'incarto ATAS/345/2017
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision from the unemployment insurance fund, but subsequently withdrew the appeal after the fund itself annulled its decision and suspended its own proceedings pending the outcome of a related dispute between the appellant and the cantonal employment office currently before the same social insurance chamber. The court consequently took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from its roll, rendering a decision to terminate the proceedings based on the appellant's action.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal Following Fund's Annulment: The court consequently took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from its roll, rendering a decision to terminate the proceedings based on the appellant's action.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassa di disoccupazione vertenza di assicurazione sociale procedura di annullamento desistenza dall'azione disoccupazione soppressione delle prestazioni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the context of potentially imposing costs, although the final orders only record the withdrawal and striking of the case.
Generato dall'IA
A/2534/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Fund Decision
A/4161/2020
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision
A/1417/2017
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal Rendered Moot by Fund's Annulment
A/3725/2017
Appeal Withdrawal Against Unemployment Insurance Decision
A/1861/2021
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the context of potentially imposing costs, although the final orders only record the withdrawal and striking of the case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/986/2017

### [ATAS/345/2017](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1973056) du 02.05.2017 ( CHOMAG ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2017/0003/ATAS_000345_2017_A_986_2017.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/986/2017 ATAS/345/2017 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 2 mai 2017 2ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à Genève, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître DANDRES Christian · recourant

contre

SYNA CAISSE DE CHOMAGE, Administration Suisse Romande sise route du Petit-Moncor 1a, VILLARS-GLÂNE · intimée

Vu la décision sur opposition rendue par SYNA Caisse de chômage (ci-après : la caisse) le 21 février 2017,

Vu le recours du 20 mars 2017 de Monsieur A______ (ci-après : le recourant) contre cette décision, recours ouvert sous le numéro de cause A/986/2017,

Vu la réponse de la caisse du 24 mars 2017, par laquelle elle indique annuler sa décision du 21 février 2017 et suspendre la procédure d’opposition dans l’attente d’une décision entrée en force dans le litige opposant le recourant au service juridique de l’office cantonal de l’emploi, litige actuellement pendant par-devant la chambre des assurances sociales de la Cour de justice (cause A/984/2017),

Vu l’écriture du recourant du 12 avril 2017, par lequel il indique retirer son recours A/986/2017, mais maintenir celui qui l’oppose à l’office cantonal de l’emploi (cause

A/984/2017),

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la présente cause A/986/2017 du rôle.

\* \* \* \* \*

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Sylvie SCHNEWLIN · Le président Raphaël MARTIN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le