Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/345/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/345/2016 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Moot Due to Annulled Decision

Numero d'incarto ATAS/345/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured person appealed a decision by the cantonal disability insurance office (OAI) that denied coverage for initial vocational training. The OAI subsequently issued a new decision annulling its initial ruling and returning the case for further investigation and a new decision, which is permissible under the Social Insurance General Part Act until the pre-trial brief is sent to the court. Therefore, the court found that the appeal had become moot because the challenged decision was withdrawn, leading the court to strike the case from the roll without imposing fees.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Moot Due to Annulled Decision: The OAI subsequently issued a new decision annulling its initial ruling and returning the case for further investigation and a new decision, which is permissible under the Social Insurance General Part Act until the pre-trial brief is sent to the court. Therefore, the court found that the appeal had become moot because the challenged decision was withdrawn, leading the court to strike the case from the roll without imposing fees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
copertura dell'assicurazione invalidità decisione incidentale impugnabile revoca della decisione amministrativa riesame di una decisione precedente effetti di una sentenza di annullamento vertenza di assicurazione sociale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This procedural rule is generally used to declare an appeal inadmissible or moot, though it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders here. (Note: Since no explicit procedural rule is cited in the dispositive for the ruling other than the declaration of mootness, and no cost/legal aid rule is cited in the dispositive, I must strictly follow the instruction to only include provisions explicitly cited in the numbered orders.)
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court renounces collecting a fee (émolument) in order 3, which corresponds to cost provisions.
Generato dall'IA
A/3627/2007
Moot Appeal Following Insurer's Annulment of Decision
A/3300/2006
Appeal Moot Due to Annulment of Contested Decision
A/4587/2005
Appeal Moot due to Insurer's Annulment of Decision
A/305/2007
Appeal Moot Due to Annulment of Original Decision
A/145/2009
Moot Appeal Due to Annulment of Initial Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 53 al. 3 de la loi fédérale sur la partie générale du droit des assurances sociales, du 6 octobre 2000 (LPGA; RS 830.1)

This provision is cited in the reasoning to establish that the authority could reconsider its decision, leading to the appeal becoming moot, although it is not explicitly cited in the final orders as the basis for the ruling itself (which is simply declaring the case moot and striking it from the role).

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This procedural rule is generally used to declare an appeal inadmissible or moot, though it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders here. (Note: Since no explicit procedural rule is cited in the dispositive for the ruling other than the declaration of mootness, and no cost/legal aid rule is cited in the dispositive, I must strictly follow the instruction to only include provisions explicitly cited in the numbered orders.)

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court renounces collecting a fee (émolument) in order 3, which corresponds to cost provisions.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/859/2016

### [ATAS/345/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1971930) du 02.05.2016 ( AI ) , SANS OBJET

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0003/ATAS_000345_2016_A_859_2016.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/859/2016 ATAS/345/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 2 mai 2016 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE · recourante

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, Service juridique, sis rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision de l’Office de l’assurance-invalidité du canton de Genève (ci-après OAI) du 19 février 2016 refusant une demande de prise en charge de formation professionnelle initiale à Madame A______ ;

Vu le recours interjeté le 7 mars 2016 par l’assurée, envoyé en courrier à l’office de l’assurance-invalidité du canton de Genève (OAI), et transmis par celui-ci à la chambre de céans, indiquant qu’elle sera en mesure de produire un rapport médical du docteur B______ de l’unité de psychiatrie et du développement mental des HUG dans un délai d’un mois ;

Vu le courrier de la chambre de céans du 16 mars 2016, octroyant un délai à l’OAI pour produire sa réponse et son dossier ;

Vu le courrier de l’OAI du 13 avril 2016 et sa décision du même jour notifiée au recourant par laquelle il annule sa décision du 19 février 2016 et prononce le renvoi de la cause pour complément d’instruction et nouvelle décision ;

Considérant qu’aux termes de l’art. 53 al. 3 de la loi fédérale sur la partie générale du droit des assurances sociales, du 6 octobre 2000 (LPGA; RS 830.1), l’assurance peut reconsidérer sa décision ou sa décision sur opposition jusqu’à l’envoi de son préavis au Tribunal ;

Que tel est le cas en l’espèce ;

Qu’au vu de l’annulation de la décision, le recours devient sans objet et qu’il convient de rayer la cause du rôle.

\*\*\*

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte de la décision rendue par l’intimé le 19 février 2016.![endif]>![if>

2. Constate que le recours est devenu sans objet.![endif]>![if>

3. Renonce à percevoir un émolument. ![endif]>![if>

4. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Brigitte BABEL · La présidente Catherine TAPPONNIER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le