Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/333/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/333/2007 Generato dall'IA

Judicial Sale Voided for Insufficient Public Notice

Numero d'incarto ATAS/333/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought to set aside a judicial sale concerning property, claiming the procedure resulted in a significant undervaluation due to procedural defects, primarily an insufficient public notice period that deterred potential bidders, which was contrary to the statutory requirements intended to ensure fair market price realization. The court reasoned that while the statute mandated a specific minimum notice period before the sale, which was demonstrably not met, the mere fact that the property sold for less than the appealing party desired did not automatically establish prejudice or nullify the sale unless there was proof that the defect directly prevented a higher bid, ultimately concluding that the lack of adherence to the mandatory notice period required voiding the sale to protect the integrity of the public bidding process and the rights of the debtor.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judicial Sale Voided for Insufficient Public Notice: The court reasoned that while the statute mandated a specific minimum notice period before the sale, which was demonstrably not met, the mere fact that the property sold for less than the appealing party desired did not automatically establish prejudice or nullify the sale unless there was proof that the defect directly prevented a higher bid, ultimately concluding that the lack of adherence to the mandatory notice period required voiding the sale to protect the integrity of the public bidding process and the rights of the debtor.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
annunci pubblici realizzazione forzata di immobili diritto di proprietà requisito legale valore di corso esclusione dell'offerente

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision dictates the allocation of court costs, which is done in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



                ! "### 

$$%"

 "$ &' (&"&' % $&(% ( '%

()*     *   



  !"!#



"#!

  $$       $    $ % #(0 &'(!#("%!"# )*+,%&"#%-.--   /

        Christine BULLIARD et Bertrand REICH    

   4.154  

!"!%!0&"#&(6"(!7

8(9"!%:&(#(""0&!!"!##(;"!#(" !<&! !(=7

 8"! (#!> #!  &!#(%    ?   !"(# : "#(" ;(( &"! @0&":   !"!# = ">!# &"!  "(  9>(! # ;0>!(!.33/%&"!?>!(#*#!0&"0&!6$ A%#? ?#("!"(#!"!#:"#(";((&"!"(&#=! .33+ B"C0 #!(#0D "(# "! *#! (>#(C0 &!  ( # #!)0 &!  0(("9##E!"!%?!&!0##(@#CC0E;(!7

$ (% +" , '% "$ &' (&"&' % $&(% ( '%

 -../   0

1./2/** 3 -4 5! 6 '7

-' "#E(#"C>"("&#("%"(#&"!$ A "  A %   ?@ 0((" ! ! "!#  !"(#   !"!#:"#("&"!"(&#=!.33+'

.' 8F"##?="('

5' 0!>!"(#0&": @C(#"(9>(!#;0>!(! .33/%#(>(#E0&"!="#;"!&!6$ A'

,' "#E!"!#?@@&@#!&!0##("E;(!>"(! !&!0#!"!'

+' (#?&!"0!#C!#(#'

/' &&(#("8!#'+3 %(;"!&!#(?8&>#;"!! !"!"#!&!0#!!*#0(539"!6"#(;(#("&!&( !"0!0 !(=;00!!%$)G(H!)";?(/%/33,   %#!"(:&(!'0(&#*#!&!""C0'0"(!"(#I D((?!:##?0(("!"!#0(!"=#(!(#& 0(("##?07=D:&"!&"!?"#(;(#(&">"(!!## #!0(("7D&"!#!(C#!""!&!0##'$(0"(!



1,,2-1.33/  45154   "#(# &  #!"( 00# 00!0 " ##! D =D # D (4%  !(=;00!!&"!!&#!!#(6!!!"!?8( >!0!!(!!>='0"(!!"!#("!"!"F  &!>% ?( !"# 9"(#% (( ?  0((" ##?0 # 8>"&&  ?0#0:&0(0!"!#B!#'-5.%-3/#-3JD'



    C!;;(!I !0(#I       (!! $ =$

"&(";"!&!0#!!*##"#(;(0:&!#(#E@;;(&!C!;;





1,,2-1.33/