Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/319/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/319/2005 Generato dall'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement

Numero d'incarto ATAS/319/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the proper scope of a statutory provision regarding the enforcement of judgments, specifically challenging whether a certain procedural step was validly taken. The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement: The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
istanza d'interpretazione presupposto processuale esecuzione portata del dovere legale interpretazione e applicazione restrittive azione di accertamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed on the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
A/781/2005
Statutory Interpretation Regarding Formal Validity and Enforcement of Legal Instruments
A/1808/2002
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Transaction Classification
A/724/2007
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Contract and Property Disputes
A/1138/2005
Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Regulation Compliance
A/1850/2006
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Commercial Appeals

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               $%$&''(  $)*%$&''(



+  ,+ ! -  +! -! 

&.  /0   *% 1 &''( 



  2222222222  $

 !"#$#%&&&&&&&&&&' ()



$ 

34!  5 !   -3 - 6  $0#  3 -     -   " '$*+,-./

            ! "#

   *215*  

"# #6 $""00!7# 8 $942 '"2:$7 2335 $"# 66$": "#07 233;<

  "5:"#07 233;$ #6": (#/  2334<

6." <

""06 $6 "6 $$"8=>$",0 $:2 / 2334< $$"=8-8"$$" . ""# #=8/"= /$#$#"$6 ?9&&&&&&&&&&$"00$#0"807"  $$"@6$( -8"",0 23346 ?0 &&&&&&&&&&$$$=$$" . /$6 -$060  "#=$=8#!!! /6/$>$  $" $=8 $ $ $ 67$#< / $ $  "/$7A$9

 ! - 3   ,+ ! -  +! -! 



7/8   9  :   ;# *<& -=>

:9 $-"=8 -8$7# 8 $942 '- 8$  " ?"0 &&&&&&&&&&  $$ =8  ! "  #$# %&&&&&&&&&&' 9

29 #="# 66$": "#07 233;9

59 $$=  $"/7A$9

;9 $=6 #" $! $$9

49 66$"8 $943 ( 06 $"=86/$( 0   $ 6 #$ >$""#"53A ".$($6 6 00"#" # 7(#"# " 'BCD B(=EE33;   $ @06 9"#6$>$ 6 !#90#0 "$F )"= @$0$="#  $"# 7$ $6" "#$$=#<7)@6 6 =0$($06/ "0" $$



1+12334  *515*   $ "#<)6 $ !$ " 6 #$$9'0#0  $$ 6  $  ##0$ #0# #  $$  ) 7) $ ) *"  7(#"# " 6 6$  0$.    =8 "/ "#   /790#0 "  0$  0G " 6 / =  $ A$  =  "# $$=# $ 8/66 " =#$#@6#"#  $ $9:52:3E$:3,)9





    ! (( F  #"$F     77       

6( 0"6 #$ >$$$(#@6 $=8-8(((#"#  " 6 ! ((





1+12334