Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/316/2015 • CJ GE ATAS/316/2015 Generato dall'IA

Claimant's Appeal Moot After Administrative Annulment

Numero d'incarto ATAS/316/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a refusal of disability insurance benefits dated February 16, 2015; however, the administrative office subsequently annulled its own decision, leading the claimant's counsel to inform the court that the appeal was now moot and requested the case be struck from the roll, whereupon the Social Insurance Chamber declared the appeal without object and ordered the case removed from the court register.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 5 LTF; Claimant's Appeal Moot After Administrative Annulment: A claimant appealed a refusal of disability insurance benefits dated February 16, 2015; however, the administrative office subsequently annulled its own decision, leading the claimant's counsel to inform the court that the appeal was now moot and requested the case be struck from the roll, whereupon the Social Insurance Chamber declared the appeal without object and ordered the case removed from the court register.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione vertenza di assicurazione sociale estinzione delle prestazioni assicurative legittimazione a ricorrere prestazioni assicurative

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 5 LTF
This provision is implicitly cited as the basis for striking the case from the role because the appeal became without object (though the specific article for striking is often linked to rules of procedure following the loss of object, in this context, the final disposal is achieved through this administrative action inherent to the court's procedure when an appeal is moot).
Generato dall'IA
A/1746/2024
Appeal Moot Due to Annulment of Administrative Decision
A/3604/2021
Disability Benefits Appeal Rendered Moot by Insurer's Voluntary Annulment
A/2665/2013
Disability Insurance Appeal Moot Due to Annulment of Decision
A/302/2018
Mootness of Appeal After Administrative Decision Annulment
A/101/2006
Disability Benefits Appeal Moot Due to Procedural Annulment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 5 LTF

This provision is implicitly cited as the basis for striking the case from the role because the appeal became without object (though the specific article for striking is often linked to rules of procedure following the loss of object, in this context, the final disposal is achieved through this administrative action inherent to the court's procedure when an appeal is moot).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/942/2015

### [ATAS/316/2015](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970894) du 29.04.2015 ( AI ) , SANS OBJET

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2015/0003/ATAS_000316_2015_A_942_2015.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/942/2015 ATAS/316/2015 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 29 avril 2015 4ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée au GRAND-LANCY, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Diane BROTO · recourante

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, sis Rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision de refus de prestations du 16 février 2015 rendue par l’office de l’assurance-invalidité du canton de Genève (ci-après OAI) à l’encontre de Madame A______ (ci-après l’assurée ou la recourante) ;

Vu le recours interjeté le 19 mars 2015 par l’assurée, par l’intermédiaire de son conseil ;

Vu l’écriture du 16 avril 2015 du conseil de la recourante indiquant que la décision du 16 février 2015 ayant été en son temps annulée par l’OAI, le recours apparaît à ce jour sans objet et la cause peut être rayée du rôle ;

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Constate que le recours est devenu sans objet.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Isabelle CASTILLO · La présidente Juliana BALDÉ

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le