Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/312/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/312/2006 Generato dall'IA

Appellate Review of Exclusion of Witness Prior Conduct Evidence

Numero d'incarto ATAS/312/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court considered whether a trial court correctly excluded certain evidence regarding the prior conduct of a testifying witness, specifically focusing on documents related to the witness's past violations of similar regulations and a previous enforcement action. The court reasoned that while the excluded evidence might have been relevant to the witness's credibility, the trial court did not abuse its discretion because the evidence was substantially cumulative of testimony already presented and its probative value was outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, thus affirming the original judgment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Appellate Review of Exclusion of Witness Prior Conduct Evidence: The court reasoned that while the excluded evidence might have been relevant to the witness's credibility, the trial court did not abuse its discretion because the evidence was substantially cumulative of testimony already presented and its probative value was outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, thus affirming the original judgment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esclusione del testimone attendibilità dei testimoni condotta precedente forza probatoria prove irrilevanti esame delle censure formali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of judicial costs, as cited in the final order regarding costs.

Art. 64 LTF

This article governs legal aid, as cited in the final order concerning legal aid.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

     

   

  !" #

$ $%

& !'(& %!$  &% $%'

%) * "

+ "   #

  

  !"!#$# "! % &  '  !-!$ (!)$)     *!+  ,  #)$ -))

-$!

. &    & & !-)$ &) !-/ ) ) )$)# ()   -) 01  "-$ 0222  3

 4 &&& &&  ) 5  -($ 1  ""#  "-$ 62 0100    17 

     ' 1/8 '

+  , -+   #$)$ !# "-!  "!$$)- - :! )$ -*);$-)! < = $ "-!  "!$  ;) "! )$  ) "!>  . &  $! 0336 $ 033? "#!)- !$ ,  -"))$  ""!$);  -)@@A

 :!#  -@@!$ :!;)  -!$ ,:  B $!"!!  -5 @-!$)-  :$(#$))A

:  #$#   !   -5 "!-@)- !# "-!  "!$  ;) ) $ "-!   "!>    & C-!:()  4A

 !"!#$# "! % &    #"-#    1D ) 1226 "!>  :)$)# 5)$ E -*$)!  "!$$)-  !)-   ) "!-@)-A

:"!>  #(;  -!!)! "! #))-  8 C5)! 1229 . &   -@)!# ,  !-)$ + "!$$)- $#!)!  1D ) 0333 #$)$ "#!)#A

 "! #))-  17 C5)! 1229  4  !@#  "!)  (!;  ))$! $)$ ,:)  :;))$ " : ) "!-@)-A

 "! #))- ! -""-)$)-  13 -5*! 1229 . &   !C$# :-""-)$)- @-!# "! :!#A

 ')  )$!C$# !-!  0D #*! 1229 -$! )$ #))- ! -""-)$)-A ,: "!#) ,: 5)$ #;$ -))$# :  4  #))- @-! , ')  :#$)$ $-$@-) " +#$# ,: -$ > -! E :""   :  4 F  ! -G  + !!  !C$$$ $$  !"-*))$#   "!)  (!;   FA

%   -+ -@-!#$ E H!$I 9?   -) ! H-!;)$)- C)))! <=  !)* $-  ! -) $ -"#$$ "-! $$!   "!#$ A

:E $!  :!$I D0   -) !  "!-#! ))$!$)5  01 "$*! 0379 < = :$-!)$# "$ :-@@) - ! !,J$ -!-! :""    $)! -$  )$$)- C!)), $ "$)* :J$! @@$# "! :)  "!-#!    ) ,)>!$  !-)$ $ -*);$)-  "!$) $  #))- ! 5)$ -""-*A

: :"> ) $ )#)* ,  )$$)- C!)), :  4 "-!!)$ J$! @@$# "! :)   "!#$ "!-#!A

:)  C$)@) "! -#,$  :""!  A

/6689/1229 ' 8/8 '

 % $!'.  !'(& %!$  &% $%'

+ // 

0I ""    4 &&& &&  I

1I ) )"!$)$  #)  0 12  # "-!  #$!)!I

8I )$ ,  -)! $ E  )"-)$)-  ;!@@ "-! -$$)-I

 ;!@@)>!  !#)$ K

!)'-)  4 -!) L   

 -") -@-!   "!#$ -!- $ -$)@)# + "!$) "!  ;!@@

/6689/1229