Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/297/2010 • CJ GE ATAS/297/2010 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Late Employment Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/297/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal filed by an insured person against a decision rendered by the cantonal employment office on January 7, 2010. During the personal appearance hearing on March 18, 2010, the appellant indicated she was withdrawing her appeal after the respondent noted it was filed late. Consequently, the court formally acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the docket.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Late Employment Appeal: During the personal appearance hearing on March 18, 2010, the appellant indicated she was withdrawing her appeal after the respondent noted it was filed late. Consequently, the court formally acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the docket.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria disdetta tardiva perdita dell'impiego audizione personale diritto alla disconnessione legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the context of imposing costs, although the dispositive itself only orders the case to be struck from the roll following a withdrawal.
Generato dall'IA
A/466/2015
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
A/3143/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Dispute
A/3914/2018
Appeal Withdrawal in Employment Benefits Case
A/1109/2012
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
A/1415/2015
Withdrawal of Employment Office Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the context of imposing costs, although the dispositive itself only orders the case to be struck from the roll following a withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/572/2010

### [ATAS/297/2010](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1964220) du 18.03.2010 ( CHOMAG ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2010/0002/ATAS_000297_2010_A_572_2010.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/572/2010 ATAS/297/2010 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 18 mars 2010

En la cause

Madame B_______, domiciliée à ONEX · recourante

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'EMPLOI, Service juridique, Glacis-de-Rive 6, GENEVE · intimé

Vu la décision sur opposition rendue par l’Office cantonal de l’emploi (OCE) le 7 janvier 2010 à l’encontre de Madame B_______,

Vu le recours interjeté par l’intéressée auprès du Tribunal de céans le 11 février 2010,

Vu la réponse de l’intimé du 24 février 2010,

Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 18 mars 2010,

Attendu qu'à cette dernière audience, après que l’intimé a fait remarquer que le recours était tardif, l’assurée a indiqué qu’elle le retirait,

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait du recours.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Yaël BENZ · La Présidente : Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le