Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/297/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/297/2008 Generato dall'IA

OCAI Disability Insurance Appeal Withdrawal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/297/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A decision by the Cantonal Office of Disability Insurance (OCAI) on February 5, 2008, refused medical measures for a child, leading to an appeal filed by the child's treating physician on February 8, 2008. Subsequently, the child's father clarified that the insurance had agreed to cover the hospitalization costs for the child's respiratory distress, prompting him to withdraw the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Court to declare the appeal admissible, take note of the withdrawal, strike the case from the roll, and waive the collection of fees.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 413/2008, Art. 297/2008, Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; OCAI Disability Insurance Appeal Withdrawal: Subsequently, the child's father clarified that the insurance had agreed to cover the hospitalization costs for the child's respiratory distress, prompting him to withdraw the appeal, leading the Cantonal Social Insurance Court to declare the appeal admissible, take note of the withdrawal, strike the case from the roll, and waive the collection of fees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione per invalidità figlio minorenne disabile soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione vertenza di assicurazione sociale spese legali decisioni in materia medica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 413/2008
This reference appears in the header but is the case number, not a legal provision used in the dispositive.
Art. 297/2008
This reference appears in the header but is the case number, not a legal provision used in the dispositive.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the text provided, the instruction to include only provisions cited in the dispositive, and the actual dispositive only containing procedural steps (receivability, withdrawal, striking off, costs), means that if no explicit legal basis for admissibility or the decision itself is listed in orders 1-3, only cost provisions (order 4) should be included. Since no specific legal basis for orders 1-3 or 4 is cited, the array remains empty based on the strict rule.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although the decision states it waives collection of fees ('Renonce à percevoir un émolument'), it does not explicitly cite the procedural rule governing that decision (e.g., Art. 66 LTF or relevant cantonal law) in the dispositive orders.
Generato dall'IA
A/1463/2008
Appeal Withdrawn After Subsequent Grant of Benefits
A/3784/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Disability Insurance Case
A/3396/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Disability Insurance Case
A/955/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision
A/4295/2008
Withdrawal of Disability Insurance Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 413/2008

This reference appears in the header but is the case number, not a legal provision used in the dispositive.

Art. 297/2008

This reference appears in the header but is the case number, not a legal provision used in the dispositive.

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the text provided, the instruction to include only provisions cited in the dispositive, and the actual dispositive only containing procedural steps (receivability, withdrawal, striking off, costs), means that if no explicit legal basis for admissibility or the decision itself is listed in orders 1-3, only cost provisions (order 4) should be included. Since no specific legal basis for orders 1-3 or 4 is cited, the array remains empty based on the strict rule.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although the decision states it waives collection of fees ('Renonce à percevoir un émolument'), it does not explicitly cite the procedural rule governing that decision (e.g., Art. 66 LTF or relevant cantonal law) in the dispositive orders.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/413/2008 ATAS/297/2008

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 4 du 12 mars 2008

En la cause

Enfant B_________, soit pour lui son père, Monsieur B_________, recourant domicilié à GENEVE

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE, sis rue intimé de Lyon 97, GENEVE

Siégeant : Juliana BALDE, Présidente; Nathalie BLOCH et Dominique JECKELMANN, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision de l'Office cantonal de l'assurance-invalidité (ci-après OCAI) du 5 février 2008 refusant des mesures médicales en faveur de l'enfant B_________

Vu le recours interjeté le 8 février 2008 par le Dr L_________, médecin adjoint responsable de l'unité de néonatologie, concernant l'enfant B_________,

Vu le courrier du 24 février 2008 de Monsieur B_________, père des enfants B_________, dans lequel il explique que c'est bien son fils qui a reçu des soins pour une détresse respiratoire, que l'assurance-invalidité a accepté de prendre en charge les frais d'hospitalisation le concernant de sorte qu'il retire le recours ;

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Statuant

A la forme :

1. Déclare le recours recevable.

Au fond :

2. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

3. Raye la cause du rôle.

4. Renonce à percevoir un émolument.

La greffière La présidente

Isabelle CASTILLO Juliana BALDE

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/413/2008