Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/293/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/293/2016 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Withdraws Appeal After Extension Granted

Numero d'incarto ATAS/293/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant appealed a decision by the disability insurance office granting only a quarter disability pension, seeking at least a half pension, after the court granted an extension for the claimant to complete the appeal. The court noted that the claimant subsequently submitted a letter on the extended deadline date indicating the withdrawal of the appeal, and consequently, the court acknowledged the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant Withdraws Appeal After Extension Granted: The court noted that the claimant subsequently submitted a letter on the extended deadline date indicating the withdrawal of the appeal, and consequently, the court acknowledged the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
mezza rendita d'invalidità proroga tardiva del termine soppressione della rendita d'invalidità ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria prelievo anticipato legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article is typically the basis for the decision on costs, though not explicitly cited in the final orders here, the implicit application in similar cases involving withdrawal often leads to no cost imposition or a reference to the general procedural law for costs. However, based strictly on the requirement to only include provisions *explicitly cited* in the dispositive, and seeing no citation, this article is excluded. **Given the strict rule, and since no articles are explicitly cited in Orders 1 and 2**, the resulting array must be empty.
Generato dall'IA
A/188/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Pension Denial
A/1835/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Partial Disability Pension
A/605/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Termination of Disability Pension
A/1601/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal in Disability Pension Case
A/3078/2010
Appellant Withdraws Appeal Against Limited Disability Pension Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is typically the basis for the decision on costs, though not explicitly cited in the final orders here, the implicit application in similar cases involving withdrawal often leads to no cost imposition or a reference to the general procedural law for costs. However, based strictly on the requirement to only include provisions *explicitly cited* in the dispositive, and seeing no citation, this article is excluded. **Given the strict rule, and since no articles are explicitly cited in Orders 1 and 2**, the resulting array must be empty.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/469/2016

### [ATAS/293/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1971883) du 19.04.2016 ( AI ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0002/ATAS_000293_2016_A_469_2016.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/469/2016 ATAS/293/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 19 avril 2016 2ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Monique STOLLER FÜLLEMANN · recourante

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, sis rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision du 21 janvier 2016 de l’office de l’assurance-invalidité (ci-après l’OAI), par laquelle il a calculé le montant de la rente mensuelle AI de Madame A______ (ci-après : la recourante) sur la base d’un quart de rente ;

Vu le recours du 11 février 2016, par lequel la recourante conclut préalablement à ce qu’un délai lui soit accordé pour compléter son recours et principalement, à ce que la décision de l’OAI soit annulée et à ce qu’il soit dit qu’elle avait droit au minimum à une demi-rente d’invalidité ;

Vu le délai au 21 mars 2016 que lui fixé la chambre de céans pour compléter son recours, délai prolongé sur demande au 18 avril 2016 ;

Vu le courrier du 18 avril 2016 de la recourante, par lequel elle indique retirer son recours ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

\*\*\*\*\*

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Sylvie SCHNELWIN · Le président Raphaël MARTIN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le