Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/29/2018 • CJ GE ATAS/29/2018 Generato dall'IA

Interested Party's Letter Not Valid Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/29/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed whether an interested party's letter dated December 15, 2017, to the disability insurance office, requesting the medical expert report and a re-dated decision to preserve appeal deadlines, constituted a valid appeal against the office's December 7, 2017, decision denying disability benefits. The court reasoned that the December 15th communication was explicitly intended to request documents to preserve the right to appeal and was later confirmed by the party's counsel not to be an appeal, leading the court to formally rule that the letter did not constitute an act of appeal and to strike the matter from its roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF; Interested Party's Letter Not Valid Appeal: The court reasoned that the December 15th communication was explicitly intended to request documents to preserve the right to appeal and was later confirmed by the party's counsel not to be an appeal, leading the court to formally rule that the letter did not constitute an act of appeal and to strike the matter from its roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
documenti validi contenzioso dell'assicurazione invalidità decisioni in materia medica legittimazione a ricorrere interesse ad agire sentenze sulla validità di un atto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF
The court implicitly applied procedural law (likely related to finality or admissibility, often referenced under Art. 93 LTF in this context) by stating in the reasoning that the letter did not constitute an appeal, which leads to the order to strike the case from the roll.
Generato dall'IA
A/1842/2024
Claimant's Letter Deemed Insufficient for Appeal
A/4243/2019
Invalid Appeal Stripped from Roll
A/1879/2019
Insured's Undated Letter Deemed New Request, Not Appeal, Barring Immediate Judicial Review
A/4570/2019
Insurance Office v. Applicant (Disability Appeal Deadline)
A/3135/2023
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Challenge Against Preceding Informal Letter

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF

The court implicitly applied procedural law (likely related to finality or admissibility, often referenced under Art. 93 LTF in this context) by stating in the reasoning that the letter did not constitute an appeal, which leads to the order to strike the case from the roll.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/5023/2017

### [ATAS/29/2018](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1973917) du 17.01.2018 ( AI ) , AUTRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2018/0000/ATAS_000029_2018_A_5023_2017.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/5023/2017 ATAS/29/2018 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 17 janvier 2018 4ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à CAROUGE, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Michael ANDERS · recourante

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITÉ DU CANTON DE GENÈVE, sis rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision de l’office de l’assurance-invalidité du canton de Genève (ci-après OAI) du 7 décembre 2017 refusant une rente d’invalidité à Madame A______ (ci-après l’intéressée) ;

Vu le courrier du 15 décembre 2017 du conseil de l’intéressée adressé à l’OAI lui demandant de lui faire parvenir le rapport d’expertise médicale de la PMU en y joignant sa décision nouvellement datée, ceci afin de préserver le délai de recours intégral auquel sa cliente avait droit ;

Vu le courrier du 21 décembre 2017 de l’OAI transmettant à la chambre de céans l’original du courrier du 15 décembre 2017 comme objet de sa compétence ;

Vu l’écriture du 22 décembre 2017 de la chambre de céans ;

Vu l’écriture du 9 janvier 2018 du conseil de l’intéressée indiquant que sa lettre du 15 décembre 2017 adressée à l’OAI ne constituait nullement un acte de recours.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Constate que le courrier du 15 décembre 2017 de Madame A______ ne constitue pas un acte de recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Isabelle CASTILLO · La présidente Catherine TAPPONNIER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le