Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/249/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/249/2006 Generato dall'IA

Contractor Delay vs. Owner Authorization Failure in Construction Contract Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/249/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute involved a construction contract where the contractor alleged the owner breached by failing to provide necessary authorizations in a timely manner, leading to delays and increased costs, and the owner counterclaimed for liquidated damages due to the contractor's delayed completion. The court examined whether the owner's actions constituted a compensable delay or a non-compensable delay excusing liquidated damages, focusing on the contract's provisions regarding notice and the allocation of risk for unforeseen delays. The court determined that the owner's procedural failures regarding authorization requests were non-compensable events under the contract terms, thus upholding the application of liquidated damages against the contractor for the ultimate delay in completion.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contractor Delay vs. Owner Authorization Failure in Construction Contract Dispute: The court examined whether the owner's actions constituted a compensable delay or a non-compensable delay excusing liquidated damages, focusing on the contract's provisions regarding notice and the allocation of risk for unforeseen delays. The court determined that the owner's procedural failures regarding authorization requests were non-compensable events under the contract terms, thus upholding the application of liquidated damages against the contractor for the ultimate delay in completion.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di costruzione ritardi procedurali ricorso per risarcimento danni costruzione abusiva nullità del contratto nozione di amministrazione aggiudicatrice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to decide on the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Art. 64 LTF
Applied to decide on the request for legal aid for the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
A/3945/2006
Owner v. Contractor: Breach of Construction Contract and Termination Validity
A/330/2005
Construction Contract Breach and Damages
C/24343/2007
Contractor Delay Penalties and Modification Costs Dispute
C/26526/2010
Owner v. Contractor: Termination for Breach and Reimbursement of Completion Costs
C/3387/2014
Contractor v. Homeowner: Breach of Contract and Procedural Default

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to decide on the court costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied to decide on the request for legal aid for the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               $%&'($)+  $)%,$)&



- !.-    -   !

/01 + # 2+ 0 )&



  !





!

""       "   #  $% !./ !&!'($)!+,$-*--   *



           ! "#

   5*0'5   #  3 6    &//7/ % %.!/ % 89.:%-;*((,,(<*(('=

>%/)/<%.%%>%.!/%89.:-.*((4=

)%/%-;!*((4$ ""       "   #   ?5)@ A  B$   %//  %! C >%.!/ % 89.: /!!<.!-;*((,!;6>,(<*((4$.!76>%)! ;6>C !! %@ %! %> & C D C ED5!  E <  7.!6%<!F!%//..%.$%!6> .)!)%!/:!<%.)%!C>%.!/% 89.:=

)%/))!%*+<.&*((4$;!/5=

>/!!!%/)!%*1%/.&*((4$G, ;<*((1$!.)!.!C!=

>!./,-;<*((1;!%=

#   6   :<  H:! ;% ?B  /!/ .%7/ !  !!/$ %@  - I! *((,$  & ! %  $.)/%4;:$%!)/%!!<5)/%!$4))/!! -1;:?!J-!J!41 B=

 ! C H! % H/! % -1 ;: $ )  & 7/%/*2;<*(('? E-,(-(1B$% :<%)!/$ -, 7/<$%)!!!:!).!!! &!%   % /:   C ! ;: !!$ $ % H!!!%H/!%<K;:=

 7./.! C >!J 41 J - !J  8J 3 $  & ! % L!!6%!!!)/<CH!J41 % 7/%/)!://%%1!&*((( ? B6! !<C7/%/H589.:&:!! H%.!/%H<&!/%*4;-+3*? B=

.)/!);:%%H)@!/!&=

   ;)%$  !!/  )! %  %/ % !!!$%!J'+J* !*4J*<>!J4J- !J&%7/%/)/%%.!!<%*(%/.&-+13? B$ 6 6> K!  !/F! %: % )!! C  !!! ../%! % >K!  % >K! %> ))! % %!$ C <  !/F! ! % %!%7!$6>))!)%!&!/F!)&)</$!C



0'1230*((4  5,0'5   %!6!!/F!%:%)!!))F!)/</.D %>%/7.!$>!5C5% !!!<%%!%>&:!? E -*+*+(%J*J-$-*1,(,%J*B=

> !/F! %: % )!! ! /:.! K:/ 6 >!!/ %  %/%!!!)6F!%>%.!/.%>77? E-,( ,+-J%J*J'B=

> M%/M 6  .%7 ) < 77! &:! ! %!.! !:!  )/!! < C >!// ?) K.)  %.!/ % 89.:B ! !D)6.! % ! !!! !  !7! ) C >K: %> !/F! %: % )!!$ % ! 6> >! ) !!6& %<!  !!/;%!?F!)&/% &7/%/%% -*!&*((4$-3,0('$%J*J*B=

>  & 7/%/ %   ;:/$ %  % F! !/$ 6 6%89.:%/;C/C>/%%.!/%89.:$ M%/M%/!%!C>%.!/%89.:<77!/!!7<F!  !@ ).! !!!$ )6>  .%7 ) < 77! &:! %!.! !:!  %! % >/ K )!! %/;C %/=

%89.:!%.%7!!;%6%/!% %/ ?.!/B %>! % >%.!/ % 89.:$    7!/ % /.!!!%)!!%/;C)GK%!6)/%!C /<!%%/%.!!<!/7=

>M%/M!!!%%/%!K)!!%/;C/ !7! ) /6! ) C >K: % >!/F! %: % )!!$ % ! 6 >!!/ ;% % ).@ !  %! ) !  .!@   7./!!M%/M?F!% &7/%/% )&/)/!/%J,B=

>>$>!./>!)//.!!!/%%/! %!C%%.!/;@%/;C/$)M%/M%-;!*((4$ 7./  )  M%/M  ))! % *+ <.& *((4$  < /./7..!!!!%)!!%/;C)G=

>>:!%>%/%!!!6>!/F!%:%)!! ..%=

 7./.! C  ;)% )/!/$  <! %@  % %/ 6!!>!))!&%>$%!65%!F!%// <&=



0'1230*((4  5'0'5   !!!7)&!/%7))!$)%>!;!  /8/! $ !  /<! %/  !!! % )!! %I.!)G%>!./=

   !4  !.-    -   !

#

56300 7  8   9: 2&) ";

-J /<&J

*J !6)/%!:!!J

,J 7.  )! %  6H )<! 7.  !  )/! F! %  %/ % ,( ; %@  !7! ) ) ..%/ %/  & 7/%/ % $ "8NO876 1$ 1(('   $  ! K.)J  %/  )! F! ):/J  ./. %!A B %6 K!.!6%/!%/&!!)%%/ !!6/= &B K) ) 6 .!7  !. )< %.% !! ! %/= B )!  :!   %  )/!!J "  ./.  !!)!//.!/.//!!B&B!B5%$ & 7/%/ %   ) ) !  .!@    6H %< %/ <&J  ./. %  .!   .D % )<$6!;!$6%/!!6/!H<))%6 /!/K)/%/!?!J-,*$-(1!-(3BJ  :77@  /%!A       PQ R D       

 )7.% )/! F!!!7/K)!!"/!!%H !!C H/.):77



0'1230*((4