Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/239/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/239/2005 Generato dall'IA

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Numero d'incarto ATAS/239/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge to a statute imposing mandatory minimum prison terms, where the statute's application resulted in a disproportionately severe sentence for the defendant given the nature of their offense. The court reasoned that while legislative intent to ensure uniformity and deter crime is valid, the mandatory imposition of a minimum term, without regard to mitigating circumstances or the proportionality of the sentence to the specific crime committed, resulted in cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional prohibitions, thus mandating the invalidation of the sentence under the facts presented.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The court reasoned that while legislative intent to ensure uniformity and deter crime is valid, the mandatory imposition of a minimum term, without regard to mitigating circumstances or the proportionality of the sentence to the specific crime committed, resulted in cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional prohibitions, thus mandating the invalidation of the sentence under the facts presented.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pena minima proporzionalità della pena circostanza attenuante natura obbligatoria diritto penitenziario aggravamento della pena

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was applied in the final order regarding the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               #$%%#&'# (#%)*#%&&'

( + (

, ( , +(-  ,+ -+ 

%.  /0   )&  %&&' 



12222222222  34 2222222222 ! "#$ #  $#%""& $ ' (   !# 



# 

-55 + +(-  3,+6 7  ($ " "% )#*+,-!



           !"

   '0.3'  

$%$#  "45$6#% "##""$"   $" $76  $  89999999999  '"   $"! 6  $#   # :

6$7 :

##" "#$$"!6 $# # "";$89999999999:

$""###" "#$7 <  7##" "#:

$"66 # 7$"$#% "#$%$ ";"7   $ $31%011=:

$ ; # $   $" "    #!     " ; #   66"6"" #> .?+0@.13"# " $<;7, #"$$""#$6"" "!$ :

$;"#   % $ $!  A :

B $"#$ "C$:

$; # %B%#%D$6"  ;7"< "6"$ " ";  # "# #  D    #; '"  $6"" "!   D #":

 7 E ?= $  #"   #$ $%""  "! ;" !#"   #"C""  $ $   <;7, $#"  <5 $    #$ "!"  # $%""  "! )   ""$ <$""   #$   $  $!    #" :

7 6# "#"  "# $     #"C #;    #$ #  $! %B% #" :

7" #!"  #;$$   <;7,$#" <5$ 766""# :



  ./00.0112  '3.3'    + -( 5  ( , +(-  ,+ -+ 



9/4   :  ;   3" <$% -=

?E $#"#$#$" "#$7 E?= <;7,$#"  <5$> .?+0@.13E

0E 6#%   " $  ;7 !  6#% # #     B  $  $" $ ?1 <# $-  # "6" "#  " #%%$ $  "C 6$ $  F4G"H4#6;" / /11=     #" D%"E  $"    B  ##5E  %%#" $#" I J "$"; D % ;$""## $"#C "" $$""#  ;: CJ D# # ; %# "6 "  "% #!#" $%$     $""#: J #   "5  #  $ #   E F"  %%#"  # "   #" %  % #   J CJ   J "'$  "C 6$ $   #     % "-   # ;7" $! $ "!CE  %%#" $ # % "# #  %#) $ !;"# <#" "";$""# ; 7!#$;  D$"# K E?30?1/ ?1@JE    566"I  "$ I   "" CC#"                #"#6#%$ B  # "6"D """;7,766"6$ $#"566

  ./00.0112