Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/225/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/225/2006 Generato dall'IA

Breach of Contract for Failure to Meet Delivery Date

Numero d'incarto ATAS/225/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of contract after the defendant failed to deliver goods by the specified date, resulting in lost profits when the plaintiff was forced to purchase replacement goods at a higher price, and the court reasoned that the contract's explicit delivery date constituted a material term, making the delay a fundamental breach justifying the damages awarded for the increased cost of cover, despite the defendant's arguments regarding the scope of remedies and the foreseeability of consequential damages.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract for Failure to Meet Delivery Date: The plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of contract after the defendant failed to deliver goods by the specified date, resulting in lost profits when the plaintiff was forced to purchase replacement goods at a higher price, and the court reasoned that the contract's explicit delivery date constituted a material term, making the delay a fundamental breach justifying the damages awarded for the increased cost of cover, despite the defendant's arguments regarding the scope of remedies and the foreseeability of consequential damages.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione essenziale del contratto contratto di compravendita acquisto di copertura difetto della cosa spese di mora spese susseguenti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

     

   

 ! "! #

"

$ "%&$ '"(  $' ('%

') * + ,    #

  

  !  " #$% &  '" $() * ) %) # #$ #  +, # !-#)     " #$ .  ! /

)

..     0 " ( %$)"  )$% ) # - 12"  () 344" 5355 6* 34

     ; 378 ;

,  - .,   !  <<<<<<<<<<< 0) * *  #%;# #0#$) # 35 $ 399:  39 $ 399=>

 ( #% # 33 ? 399:" @$%  (()  5: *$+ 399:" 0..        A;(6 B  @C% & 0)%%  ( # 8: ? # 0, #  #) & 0#$)%"  $)@ D0 *) @%  )* *+>

  () ) %)% )# (  + # %  35 @%* 399E>

 $() ) # #%) # 0)%%"  ( %$)  ()% # %#  #% #  ( & 85 ?>

 (  # 8 $ 399E" 0)%%  @$%  + # % D0 ()) )) (()>

'   .,   C*  FC) ?# AB  %)% $#@% )  ))%" #6  5 G) 3998"  + ) #  " $(% # : ?C" #)  (%#) )  *;(%#)" : ((%) ) 5E ?C  A) 5 )  ) :E B>

 ) & F) # F%) # 5E ?C " (  + @%#%  3= ?* 3991 A . 589  59EB"  #  C*  #()%"  58 @%*"  #() )) C) ($)))  + ) #   # %C   & ) ?C ))" " # F))) # F%) # *, ?C >

 @$%$) & 0) :E   5 )  H 4 "  + ) #   I)  ) D # ))) (%* & F) :E #   @%#%   () C%% # #) #   # E )+ 3999 )%  *C  5 ?* 3998 A B" D ) )* &   @%#%  F;HJ$C +C) ) F#$)%   #F*+)% # 3: ? 5243 A B>

  $(%) ( ?C #  #F(6 )  %)+>

0 *) # (# ) # 0# )* )  ()>

718447399:

; 878 ;

 ' ("%/  "%&$ '"(  $' ('%

, 011  2 3

41-   5 206 !#  (78

5  ) , () #  D  #% #  ( ) @,% & 85 ?

3 ) D  (%# ) C))

8  (() # F) :9  " @$  () #  DF (*)

@$  )  (%) K) #  #% # 89 ? #6  )@) ( ( $$#% #%  + @%#% # "

!HLMH@D E" E991   "  ) ,$(  #%  ()

K) (C%  $%$ #) N B #D ,)$) D #%  ) #% +)   ) ( #  #% ))D%> +B ,( ( D $)@  )$ (* #$# )) ) #%> B ()  C)   #  (%)) !  $%$  )) (  ) %%$) %$%%  )) B +B ) B ;#"  + @%#% #   ( ( )  $)6    DF #* #% *+  $%$ #  $)   $- # (*"

D ) ?)"  D  #% ))D% ) F*(( # D   %)% ,(%#%  ) A) 583" 59E ) 594 B

 C@@6  %#) N

;  O  P   

 ( @$ # (%) K) ) )@% , () 

718447399: