Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/218/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/218/2007 Generato dall'IA

Security Interest Intervention Denial Upheld

Numero d'incarto ATAS/218/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's order denying a motion to intervene in a case concerning the validity of a security interest, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by concluding that the appellant's interest was not adequately represented and that intervention would unduly delay the proceedings. The reviewing court affirmed the denial, reasoning that the moving party failed to demonstrate that its interests were not already adequately represented by the existing parties, and further finding that allowing intervention at that late stage would prejudice the original parties by introducing complex issues and substantially delaying the resolution of the primary dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Security Interest Intervention Denial Upheld: The reviewing court affirmed the denial, reasoning that the moving party failed to demonstrate that its interests were not already adequately represented by the existing parties, and further finding that allowing intervention at that late stage would prejudice the original parties by introducing complex issues and substantially delaying the resolution of the primary dispute.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse giuridicamente protetto azione di contestazione della graduatoria procedura di azione in materia di assicurazioni sociali opposizione al precetto esecutivo eccezioni processuali sentenze sulla validità di un atto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Generato dall'IA
A/1679/2002
Denial of Injunction Upheld
C/26706/2014
Appeal Regarding Denial of Accessory Intervention in Mortgage Dispute
C/8099/2022
Appeal of Denial of Security for Costs and Request for Suspensive Effect
C/4407/2024
Appellant Challenge to Denial of Provisional Estate Protective Measures
AC/1786/2014
Legal Aid Refusal Upheld in Protective Order Appeal Challenge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



                 !"

##$

 # %& '% %& $ #%'$ ' &$

'()   *  ) " 



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%"&'(&   "$)* * +%*##$,%*##-*  

 #$!!!!!!!!!!"#$%   "$)*+ %*##$,%*##-* ))%  



*

..     ,     "# *$% /01"   

       

   7'247  

  " 8*    234&52'((6"  %) # , " * ,))  ##$!!!!!!!!!!)##&49%+'((1:

;##$)*)#)*"<,**6$'((1:

#<*=)**)9*#*$#$'(('* $#)*$>'((6:

;#*+*)*"*$?@*)*9* !!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!*&!!!!!!!!!!#+*A**#A*)/%  $ # $ !!!!!!!!!! #B  $ # $ '((' 8<, $ #,+ '((5 C  * )  9* !!!!!!!!!! * &!!!!!!!!!! ** #,A* +%$#$!!!!!!!!!!))%#)*%D+'((5"*# <  *) !!!!!!!!!!+* DC!!!!!!!!!!#B$ #$'((5C %<*", )*#,#%*=*+*# $)* D # # + #%   >C  #%) * $)%C >D))*#,%$$*#'((9E:

,+*#,*%*#"<$*9D)%#C

# '$ + , &$ # %& '% %& $ #%'$ ' &$

* -../   0

1./2/)) 3 -4  5 &67

&C *D, #<#%#&0*>'((6*#% ))*#&&#%$>'((6*%C

'C ,+*D##+#%9$D,##)*$*% 7#C

4C ,/#$**<#>C

3C ***D,))%##+<)%B#C

5C $)#%)C

6C D))*#,%$$*C



234&52'((6  74247   1C ))*#;*C5( "9$)*#<;)+*9$ *)%*A*##%#4(8#B*9*)) $$#%#% >9%#%#" FGHF9<6"6((3   "*I$)C#%)*A*)=%C$%$#*? J#<I*$*<#%*#%>**)# #%<%:>JI))<$*9*$)+#$# *#%:J)*=*#)%**C $%$ ** )  * %%$* %$%%   J >J * J 7#"  >9%#%#))*$*B<; #+#%+>C$%$#$*$/ # )+" < * 8*"  <  #% <% * ;+)) # <%*%I)%#%*K*C&4'"&(6*&(LJC    =99B? %#*?       MN O > 

)9$#)%*A***9%I)**D,99)=99





234&52'((6