Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/202/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/202/2007 Generato dall'IA

Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness and Due Process Challenge

Numero d'incarto ATAS/202/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The litigant sought relief concerning the forfeiture of property related to alleged criminal activity, arguing that the relevant statute was unconstitutionally vague because it failed to provide adequate notice of what conduct would subject property to seizure and that the statute impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to the owner, violating due process. The court held that the statutory scheme was not unconstitutionally vague as the conduct penalized was clearly delineated, and furthermore, the statutory scheme provided for an opportunity for the owner to challenge the seizure, which satisfied due process requirements against an unconstitutional burden shift.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness and Due Process Challenge: The court held that the statutory scheme was not unconstitutionally vague as the conduct penalized was clearly delineated, and furthermore, the statutory scheme provided for an opportunity for the owner to challenge the seizure, which satisfied due process requirements against an unconstitutional burden shift.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perenzione azione mobiliare onere della prova requisito legale restrizione di diritto pubblico della proprietà reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
This provision is cited in the final order concerning the awarding of costs in favor of the respondent.
Generato dall'IA
A/2406/2004
Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness Challenge
A/1820/2002
Statutory Vagueness and Due Process Challenge to Asset Acquisition Charge
A/1391/2001
Statutory Interpretation of Property Forfeiture Criteria
A/1483/2002
Statute Vagueness Challenge and Due Process Compliance
A/2601/2004
Wrongful Attachment Procedural Due Process Challenge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This provision is cited in the final order concerning the awarding of costs in favor of the respondent.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



               !""#$!%&&# '!%&%!%&&$

 '

 ' ( ('(   ( 

)* "

 %+ ,- %&&$ 



 !"#$!%&'()* +

+

  ,,       ,    , ! +#$ +" -./0!   

            

   3&1/3  

( .'

%4  56++6"#+"++" 67+4   ++!  + 88$ 6) "   + 9* " #6+:36);7+$"6""+"$6"+4

&4 "#""<$!8+6*"+"&=#&''/$++ " #6+6+<#>"++"?%"$#>&''?"+ $++  "  8* "   " ?<0'? 84 &'4  #++ "@ 6  $ &''' + &''% $++ 6A> B ?' C! +  6 <$ &''? $++ B $9B<""6"6#+6#4

?4 "$"%%C+&''/!"$B<$6"6#+ $-+  ## " &<%0? 8!4 &' "  ?% "$#> &'''  "5 #+$4 <$ <+ 7++$ "  ") #+$  "+ " % 6+#>&''24

04 "$"26+#>&''2!$#$B<$6#+" ## " 02& 84 0' B ++ "<+$.+ #+ $   $ " ++6"C*&'''B"$#>&'''4

/4 <$8#$66+%=6+#>&''2!"$+6#6" 7>+$.++$+$$4

24  "$ " D *#> &''2!    C+$ <66+!  $8$+ 5 "6+$94

(4 <$ +C++   &( *#> &''2! $9+ 7  +" "  6#+"++<+6"@B#**+$"6+!#B #7"+$+"*"#++8"6+"4

=4 $6"&&C*&''(!6+$"*+ C+"4

D4 ++$+$+$##7$+&/C*&''(+"#B "6+6++4

%'4 ,7!$+$9"$BC94







(  '



1002(1&''2  3?1/3   %4 9*E9+C":;$+$#"8$+++$!") %@+&''?! >+"!#6$"/C9! "+6$"++*36$"+!/66$++%2C9:+4%+4 +/2 ;4

,+BE+"E$+"%2C9!6 >8$"$ &(C*&''0: F%?'%'2;!" 9*"6+$!%?8$*!  "6+++9+6#+++ >+"  " $9   B + C9 ++! ! " E+++ " E$+"*5C94

&4 8#$#+B<+4/24%+4-4%! >+"  G+  + 7 " +++ 6$* B E+4 /2 "   8$"$   6+ 9$$ " "+ "   " 2 +> &''' : ;7++*B8$"$E3*+**+" &'"$#>%D02: ,;4

,#6$+6C9""E6)+$+>4

?4    + +$  *9  % C* &''?! +G+  #"8+ " #> "6+ $9 "  "# "  4 ,  6#+$!6+"*7"+<667"+.++-$B#) "667)966>+*9##+H 8+C"7#+"$+#++6"+: F%?'&?'"4%4%I ??/"4%4&I F%&D0"4%4&I F%&(02("4%!%&2%?2 "40>+$8$;4)9"6$"7+B<667+ $*")C"+$*9: F%%(D?"42>!%%&?2' "40I  %DD=J?(64?%2"4?>;4 E667" "E6)4

04 +C+$"8#+"$6+6!+*>:+4/2 +2' ;4

/4  + ++ "* 6A " +$.+ #+ B < " 6 " 6#+"$6!#+87<8++#6+>4

24 , E+4 &2 4 %  !  $ " ++ $- + # B  66+"E+$.+#+4 66+ 8#$!#+)"E ,!6 E+40%>")9#+"?%+>%D0(<*+**+ : ,;! "+  + 7  6 5K+  +*+$ +* "$6"+ + + " 6A " +$.+ #+   ++ 6B6A>""$#6+7<<+6*$"?' CB#6+"8++6"#6+:+40%>4%+4  ,;4+++$6+$6A$7<6*+B"



1002(1&''2  301/3   #6+I7++5"+$.+#+!<$)*B/L6$:84 +40&4%+& ,;4

7. <6)!8+"++7<+#$$+>"$#6+"++ ""+"%("$#>&''%+7<"8*"&<%0?84&'$++ 6A> "  ++ C4 +8!   " "88+$ 8) +$ 6  +!     "$  6 " 6#+! "@#+ -$6"!+<+7++$"")#+$%6+#> &''24 $7!<+#$$++"+"8+"+$.+#+! #6++"*#+88+$4

<9#+ " +  7  <+ 6 6> " +" "  6#+"++6<+66++4""66B+ $9" 7   C6" " > 8$"$ "  : F ;  "#6+6+$#6#+"E+$.+#+#.# +" "  6#+ " ++ E+ 6 "@ B  8+ " "$>+4  88+! "  "# " ++  +$.+ #+ + " +$.+ #6+!"+$B#6>$$87"$>+$6A+ +"*#+++*6$C">6$4>++" #68+7"$>+>++"+$.+"6#+"88$$! *+9 "+ + 6$$#+ 6*$  $4  +$.+ #+ + " #.#+"E+#6+>B8+""#6+B  8+ " E$ :-88 %''% I   %DD& 64 %(( M F %DD( 64 ?&?;4 "$>+""+$.+#++3"$6"+"#+86 7++E+6$+$6A$B+#64

=4 *"76$)"!<*)#8"$4







NNN













1002(1&''2  3/1/3     '.  ' ( ('(   ( 

 

/01,1** 2  311 1  45 6#%  7

  ,1*

%4 $*>4

 ,1

&4 C++4

?4 +76$"+9++4

04 8#  6+ "  7E 6*+ 8#  +  6$+ .+ "  "$ " ?' C ")  +8+ 6) " > 8$"$ :,-OP-872!2''0  ;!6*"#+)""+ 6>!8#$#+5+4=&"8$"$ >8$"$"%( C &''/ : F;I  #$# "  "+ "7  ! #+8 + #A"6*+6+9+"+"#"+I"+ .+ "$  > 8$"$ 6 * 6+  6 * $+7 5 "+ " <+4 0&  F4  6$+ .+ +  6)  6 " +!*7$###A"6*!"*+.+C+B<*4  988)  6$"+         ,A* Q R         

68#"6$+.+++8$56+7EBE888$"$ "6988





1002(1&''2