Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/200/2015 • CJ GE ATAS/200/2015 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Employment Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/200/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant initiated a legal challenge against the Cantonal Employment Office, but subsequently requested a suspension of proceedings due to an impending departure abroad, which the court granted. Following the resumption of proceedings, the appellant explicitly informed the court that he was withdrawing his appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge this withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 78 let. a LPA; Withdrawal of Employment Appeal: Following the resumption of proceedings, the appellant explicitly informed the court that he was withdrawing his appeal, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge this withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di assicurazioni sociali ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria sciopero abbandono del posto di lavoro diritto alla disconnessione procedura direttrice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 78 let. a LPA
This procedural article was cited in the reasoning for the initial suspension order, but since the final order does not explicitly cite any provision governing the withdrawal/striking off, this one is excluded based on the rules.
Generato dall'IA
A/1109/2012
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
A/1415/2015
Withdrawal of Employment Office Appeal
A/3665/2023
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
A/2926/2012
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
A/3143/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 78 let. a LPA

This procedural article was cited in the reasoning for the initial suspension order, but since the final order does not explicitly cite any provision governing the withdrawal/striking off, this one is excluded based on the rules.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4205/2013

### [ATAS/200/2015](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970777) du 16.03.2015 ( CHOMAG ) , RETIRE [![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2015/0002/ATAS_000200_2015_A_4205_2013.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4205/2013 ATAS/200/2015 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 16 mars 2015 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à CHATELAINE · recourant

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'EMPLOI, sis Service juridique; Rue des Gares 16; GENEVE · intimé Vu le recours du 18 décembre 2013 de Monsieur A______, Vu le courrier de M. A______ du 9 janvier 2014 demandant à la Chambre de céans de suspendre la cause, en raison de son départ à l’étranger, Vu l’ordonnance de suspension de l’instruction selon l’art. 78 let. a LPA du 24 janvier 2014, Vu l’ordonnance de reprise de la procédure du 30 janvier 2015, Vu le courrier de M. A______ du 13 février 2015 indiquant renoncer à son recours, Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Brigitte BABEL · La Présidente : Catherine TAPPONNIER Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le