Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/194/2017 • CJ GE ATAS/194/2017 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed After Agency Agreement on Reimbursement Waiver

Numero d'incarto ATAS/194/2017
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged the requirement to reimburse supplementary benefits received, arguing that although he had acted in good faith by reporting a change in status, the agency continued to make undue payments. During a hearing, the agency confirmed the appellant's good faith and stated it would examine the possibility of waiving the restitution obligation based on the appellant's financial situation, leading the appellant to withdraw his appeal, which the court accepted, thereby striking the case from the record.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Dismissed After Agency Agreement on Reimbursement Waiver: During a hearing, the agency confirmed the appellant's good faith and stated it would examine the possibility of waiving the restitution obligation based on the appellant's financial situation, leading the appellant to withdraw his appeal, which the court accepted, thereby striking the case from the record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo di restituzione restituzione di prestazioni complementari rinuncia alle prestazioni d'assicurazione obbligo di lealtà indebito ritiro delle conclusioni civili

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision, governing costs, is typically applied when a case is removed from the roll following withdrawal.
Generato dall'IA
A/2792/2015
Appeal Withdrawn After Reimbursement Agreement Reached
A/1894/2019
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Reimbursement
A/543/2023
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Denial of Legal Aid for Reimbursement Waiver
A/2218/2021
Reimbursement of Supplementary Benefits and Withdrawal of Appeal
A/1281/2018
Appeal Withdrawn After Restitution Waiver Granted

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision, governing costs, is typically applied when a case is removed from the roll following withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4102/2016 ATAS/194/2017

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 13 mars 2017 10ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à GENÈVE recourant

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, intimé DEAS –SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE

Siégeant : Mario-Dominique TORELLO, Président; Pierre-Bernard PETITAT et Georges ZUFFEREY, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 31 octobre 2016 ; Vu le recours du 26 novembre 2016 ; Vu la réponse du 4 janvier 2017 ; Vu l’audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 13 mars 2017, lors de laquelle Monsieur A______ a indiqué que ce qu’il contestait dans le cadre de son recours, c’était le principe de la restitution de prestations qu’il avait reçues de bonne foi dès lors qu’il avait annoncé son changement de statut et que c’est le service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : le SPC ou l’intimé) qui avait continué de lui verser les prestations indues ; Attendu que lors de ladite audience, la représentante du SPC a indiqué que la bonne foi du recourant ne faisait aucun doute et qu’elle allait examiner si sa situation financière permettait une remise de l’obligation de restituer ; Que compte tenu de ce qui précède, le recourant a déclaré retirer son recours ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Le président

Florence SCHMUTZ Mario-Dominique TORELLO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4102/2016