Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/156/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/156/2008 Generato dall'IA

Pension Foundation Dissolution and Claim Withdrawal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/156/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant filed a payment claim against a professional pension foundation, but subsequently informed the Cantonal Court of Social Insurance that they were withdrawing the claim after learning that the foundation had been dissolved, leading the Court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and remove the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 69 al. 1 CPC; Pension Foundation Dissolution and Claim Withdrawal: The appellant filed a payment claim against a professional pension foundation, but subsequently informed the Cantonal Court of Social Insurance that they were withdrawing the claim after learning that the foundation had been dissolved, leading the Court to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and remove the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liquidazione della cassa pensione fondazione revoca di prestazioni sociali fondazione collettiva di previdenza condanna al pagamento pecuniario compensazione della rendita

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 69 al. 1 CPC
This provision implies the procedural action taken, as the court takes note of the withdrawal and strikes the case from the role, which is typically governed by procedural rules applicable to discontinuance.
Generato dall'IA
A/2905/2008
Pension Foundation Settlement and Withdrawal of Claim
A/659/2008
Pension Foundation Payment Claim Withdrawal Due to Settlement
A/969/2007
Claim Withdrawal Following Settlement
A/2195/2004
Pension Claim Withdrawal Against Collective Pension Foundation
A/1618/2004
Claimant v. Pension Foundation: Settlement and Withdrawal of Claim

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 69 al. 1 CPC

This provision implies the procedural action taken, as the court takes note of the withdrawal and strikes the case from the role, which is typically governed by procedural rules applicable to discontinuance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4255/2007

### [ATAS/156/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1961138) du 07.02.2008 ( LPP ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0001/ATAS_000156_2008_A_4255_2007.pdf)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4255/2007 ATAS/156/2008 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 7 février 2008

En la cause

Monsieur R_________, domicilié à Genève, CH, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître MEYER Daniel · demandeur

contre

FONDATION DE PREVOYANCE PROFESSIONNELLE DE LA SOCIETE X__________ SA dissoute, c/ PUBLEX SA · défenderesse

Vu la demande en paiement déposée le 2 novembre 2007 par Monsieur R_________ contre la FONDATION DE PRÉVOYANCE PROFESSIONNELLE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ X__________ SA,

Vu le courrier de PUBLEX du 4 décembre 2007 informant le Tribunal de céans que cette fondation de prévoyance avait été dissoute,

Vu le courrier du demandeur du 28 janvier 2008 par lequel il a informé le Tribunal de céans qu'il retirait sa demande envers la FONDATION DE PRÉVOYANCE PROFESSIONNELLE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ X__________ SA,

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Brigitte LÜSCHER · La Présidente : Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le