Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/1429/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1429/2007 Generato dall'IA

Right-of-Way Abandonment and Prescriptive Easement Claim

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1429/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed whether a party's continued use of a right-of-way, despite its documented abandonment by a predecessor, established a prescriptive easement by showing open, notorious, continuous, adverse, and permissive use for the statutory period, which required examining the totality of the circumstances, including inconsistent acts by the predecessor and the current owner's failure to clearly assert adverse intent, ultimately concluding that the use was not sufficiently adverse to ripen into a prescriptive right because it was permissive or acquiesced to by the servient estate owners.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Right-of-Way Abandonment and Prescriptive Easement Claim: The court addressed whether a party's continued use of a right-of-way, despite its documented abandonment by a predecessor, established a prescriptive easement by showing open, notorious, continuous, adverse, and permissive use for the statutory period, which required examining the totality of the circumstances, including inconsistent acts by the predecessor and the current owner's failure to clearly assert adverse intent, ultimately concluding that the use was not sufficiently adverse to ripen into a prescriptive right because it was permissive or acquiesced to by the servient estate owners.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servitù diritto legale violazione della precedenza legge sui percorsi pedonali sequestro di beni immobili diritto di espropriare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



           %&'()%*++, -%.&*)%*++,

"-

 -    -/  "  " / "

0  *  .1 20  *++, 



    !

 !

    "   # -!-./  !$ %&'() !*+ ,

            !    " # $   

   5+015  

--"  " 3 -

   -/!/    6-5)7   !8 $ !  9!  - !   .. !  )/!!-  $:!- $ ; ! <<--/   - !  => -$ .)!- 6-5)7-8#

)$/-- $ !-!- $* >.9+442-/./*(4<?  !!-!$ !-!- +442) < $$< .!- ) <-  -!+4 <?< -2-/#

 )  - $ *+  >.9 +442   ! ;)  :> - ) $:.) @/ $)-*>-+442!:> -.) @/A:) ) ).-!-.!#

  - $  /)  $ +B  >.9 +442  !  C! $   ;)-A! A:! $/!.-! :<<!-< $ -/ ==/  $/.9 $ $; / A-)/7$!)/- $ /:)7$/.9+44'A- .)!-!2 -/ :!!!!- $-/!9-) -/!/#

:)7!.-- $!!/-! !*+$/.9+442 /!/=$/C=?

/  " - " / -

 -9! $ -! .)/!!.!-76:!?', ?+!?%?*8#

 !>9< .6!?BB$ -D -!!- < .!-  ) <- !!>-$C=5-5)7E5!'2!$ - ) /$$.--!!->8#

 :!?BB E!-<:<<--!-  !!-! !-!- $ :!-BB-/*!!.) @!$:<<---$: !-  <.-- ! !-!  )-.! $  !-9!-   < ./.! ; !- +1 -/*!+2$ - !- <.--$*.*33,#

 :!? BB E !-<   <-;!-  $   !-!-  )/> -!  A- -!F * G   !-!-  ! <-;/ %A / )  - $:!!  < ) -/? +  !  -$// ..-/$:-/*! !)  )/ )  .) @ >-/  :!- BB  -/ *  . - $ $/.9 $ :/ )//$!  <-;!-  $   !-!-  )  - $:!! 6H8G# 

:-$/ A::)7 -$:!!@!/$-!/:&!/<-;! !-!-  )-/+4<?) +442C-+44,:!9- .9$-/;-!!



0123,0+44'  51015   $/.9+44'A-$ -!>-$9$ !-!- /./) +442  !6> -- (40+44,$*+?*+?4,8#

) /A! )!&!AC!/?

 " /- 3 " -    -/  "  " / "



42500 6   7     89 .(* /$:

  50

*? / >9?

 5

+? C!!?

1? -!A) /$!=!-!?

?  =<<-7  )/-$!       IJ K 9





 )- < .$)/!&!! !-<-/;)!---ADD<<-</$/ $ -)=<<



0123,0+44'