Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1306/2010 • CJ GE ATAS/1306/2010 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Upon Death of Appellant and Succession

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1306/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant initiated an appeal against a decision regarding supplementary benefits, but subsequently passed away during the proceedings, leading to a suspension of the case. The legal heirs, having accepted the succession, subsequently provided joint mandates authorizing the withdrawal of the appeal, which was formally confirmed by their representative. The court reasoned that since the legal heirs possess the standing to withdraw the appeal, and the appeal was indeed withdrawn, the matter became moot and consequently ordered the case to be struck from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 78 let. b LPA, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Upon Death of Appellant and Succession: The legal heirs, having accepted the succession, subsequently provided joint mandates authorizing the withdrawal of the appeal, which was formally confirmed by their representative. The court reasoned that since the legal heirs possess the standing to withdraw the appeal, and the appeal was indeed withdrawn, the matter became moot and consequently ordered the case to be struck from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione attiva degli eredi sospensione delle prestazioni revoca dell'esecutore testamentario ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria contratto successorio di rinuncia prestazione complementare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 78 let. b LPA
This provision was cited in the reasoning to justify the suspension of proceedings, which is a procedural step related to the final order of striking the case from the roll.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is the basis for the procedural order that the proceedings shall be free of charge (Gratuité de la procédure).

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
9C_763/2009
Bankruptcy Estate v. Cantonal Court (Invalidity Insurance Benefits Appeal)
Generato dall'IA
A/3214/2008
Appeal Dismissal Upon Appellant's Death and Estate Withdrawal
A/3425/2020
Appeal Dismissed Due to Heirs' Refusal to Continue Proceedings After Appellant's Death
A/229/2018
Appeal Moot due to Claimant's Death and Heirs' Withdrawal
A/1387/2020
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Dismissed Due to Lack of Claiming Party Following Appellant's Death and Repudiation by Heirs
A/1970/2019
Heirs Withdraw Appeal After Deceased Appellant

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 78 let. b LPA

This provision was cited in the reasoning to justify the suspension of proceedings, which is a procedural step related to the final order of striking the case from the roll.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is the basis for the procedural order that the proceedings shall be free of charge (Gratuité de la procédure).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/736/2010 ATAS/1306/2010

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 8 du 16 décembre 2010

En la cause

Hoirie de feu H___________, domiciliée c/o M. H___________ à recourante Vernamiège, représenté par la SOCIETE FIDUCIAIRE X___________ SA

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis route intimé de Chêne 54, Genève

Siégeant : Jean-Louis BERARDI, Président; Norbert HECK et Luis ARIAS, Juges assesseurs

- 2/3 -

Vu

le recours de H___________ déposé le 1er mars 2010, par l’entremise de la SOCIETE X___________ SA, représentée par I___________, contre la décision sur opposition du SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES du 28 janvier 2010 ;

le décès du recourant, survenu le 26 mai 2010, à Genève ;

l’ordonnance du Tribunal de céans du 13 juillet 2010 suspendant l’instruction de la cause en application de l’art. 78 let. b LPA ;

la lettre de la SOCIETE X___________ SA du 22 octobre 2010, informant le Tribunal que, « après en avoir discuté avec les enfants de feu Friedrich H___________ », elle retirait le recours ;

le courrier de la SOCIETE X___________ SA du 6 décembre 2010 communiquant les procurations correspondantes, signées collectivement par les héritiers légaux du défunt, à savoir H___________, H___________, H___________ et H___________, en date des 10, 11 et 18 novembre 2010 ;

la non-répudiation de la succession par les héritiers légaux.

et attendu

que les héritiers légaux ont la qualité pour retirer le recours en l’espèce (cf. arrêt du Tribunal fédéral du 7 mai 2010, 9C_763/2009, a contrario) ;

qu’en raison du retrait du recours, la cause est devenue sans objet ;

qu'en conséquence, elle doit être rayée du rôle.

A/736/2010

- 3/3 -

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

Prononce

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. La procédure est gratuite.

La greffière Le président

Irène PONCET Jean-Louis BERARDI

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties ainsi qu’à l’Office fédéral des assurances sociales par le greffe le

A/736/2010