Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1203/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1203/2007 Generato dall'IA

Enforceability of Expired Contractual Assignment Restriction

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1203/2007
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute concerned whether a contractual provision regarding assignment of rights was enforceable given that the provision's term had expired prior to the assignment in question. The court held that the provision had indeed expired, finding that the language specifying the duration of the assignment restriction was controlling, and therefore, the assignment made after the expiration of the relevant term was valid and not barred by the terminated contractual restriction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforceability of Expired Contractual Assignment Restriction: The court held that the provision had indeed expired, finding that the language specifying the duration of the assignment restriction was controlling, and therefore, the assignment made after the expiration of the relevant term was valid and not barred by the terminated contractual restriction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cessione del contratto scadenza del contratto locativo adempimento dei requisiti materiali titolo esecutivo divieto di cessione validità del contratto a termine

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the dispositive order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
A/1979/2005
Contractual Assignment Restriction Dispute
A/787/2004
Contractual Assignment Validity and Statutory Compliance
A/1746/2005
Contractual Assignment Validity and Notice Dispute
A/4359/2007
Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent
A/2811/2006
Contractual Assignment of Future Work Upon Termination vs. Public Policy Against Restraint of Trade

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



           #$%&&#'(() *#%'(+#'((,

*

 *  !*  ! ! 

!-./ $  +% / '((, 



  !"#$%& !'( ( )"(  !*"(  +( ,

(

,,,,  * ,, , (!"  -./ !'()"(  ! *"(  +( 01''

           !"   

   5$2.5  

  "  ''(  #% 6( $%%4   '    7!( " $4!$%%4 " (   85'9(: #%;'"---) *(.<=$ >

(6(" ( #.)!?$%%4' >

  "'     $$ "!? $%%4  "'@ "'" '  (#7")$%%<( '@  4!$%%<>

 A   !'( '  '(  $ ! $%%< B *  @ ? "")"@C(>

  .%D($%%<'@7! ?  "@ ''(('(>

(( @* ( $3(?$%%<'(( "'"  *  E (! @   (  " (  ( ((   "'!'">



2&#332$%%4  5.2.5  

 ! 0* 1  *  !*  ! ! 

  2   3

45.. 6 27 8) 9  :

#= (B  @* " $&!$%%4  (@ "''( #%6($%%4 )( @=

$= (B  @*(=

.= F !((@ ?=

&= !' "'=

/= (@'" (-((=

4= 7!  '(   @A ')( 7!  (  '"( C(   "  .% 6 9  (7( '9  ? 7" " 8,1GH17@44%%&  :') !(9  ( '?7!"!(E(=I$ 7" " ?7" " #< 6 $%%/ 8 J:>  !"!   (  @   !(7 ( !F ')('(-( ( ! (> ( C(  "  ? 7" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(@ E  (  *(= &$  J=  '"( C( (  '9  '  ()@"!!!F ') )(C(6(B*)=    -779K " (K       ,F) 0 L  

'7! '"(C(((7"E'(@ABA777" " ("'?@'-77



2&#332$%%4