Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/117/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/117/2009 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Remission of Repayment Obligation

Numero d'incarto ATAS/117/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision that confirmed the calculation of supplementary benefits based on only half of the appellant's rent due to cohabitation with his sister, resulting in a required restitution of 952 F. During the hearing, the appellant acknowledged the principle of the rent sharing and the resulting restitution but stated he could apply for remission of the repayment obligation, having already repaid a portion, and agreed to cease further payments pending the service's review of his remission request. Consequently, the court noted that the appeal had become moot as the parties reached an agreement for the service to examine the conditions for remission of the repayment obligation, and for the remainder, the appeal was struck from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Raye la cause du rôle; Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Remission of Repayment Obligation: During the hearing, the appellant acknowledged the principle of the rent sharing and the resulting restitution but stated he could apply for remission of the repayment obligation, having already repaid a portion, and agreed to cease further payments pending the service's review of his remission request. Consequently, the court noted that the appeal had become moot as the parties reached an agreement for the service to examine the conditions for remission of the repayment obligation, and for the remainder, the appeal was struck from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
restituzione di prestazioni complementari calcolo della prestazione pagamento del canone di locazione audizione delle parti condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa condono parziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Raye la cause du rôle
This action concludes the procedure, indicating the matter is closed because the appeal became moot.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Raye la cause du rôle.

This action concludes the procedure, indicating the matter is closed because the appeal became moot.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4291/2008

### [ATAS/117/2009](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962542) du 03.02.2009 ( PC ) , SANS OBJET

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2009/0001/ATAS_000117_2009_A_4291_2008.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4291/2008 ATAS/117/2009 ARRET DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 2 du 3 février 2009

En la cause

Monsieur P_________, domicilié à Onex, CH · recourant

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis Route de Chêne 54, Genève · intimé

Vu la décision sur opposition du 28 octobre 2008 confirmant la prise en compte du loyer à raison de la moitié vu la cohabitation du recourant avec sa sœur, et la demande de restitution en résultant, de 952 F ;

Vu le recours, la réponse du SPC et les pièces figurant au dossier ;

Vu l’audience de ce jour, lors de laquelle les parties ont déclaré ce qui suit :

« M. P_________ : J’ai pris note des explications du Tribunal sur la justification du partage du loyer avec ma sœur et de la restitution qui en découle. Je suis donc d’accord avec la décision de principe. Toutefois, je prends note que je peux demander la remise de l’obligation de restituer. J’indique cependant avoir déjà commencé le remboursement à raison de 150 fr. par mois, il me reste ce jour 222 fr. à payer. Je prends note que le SPC examinera ma demande et rendra une décision, et que dans l’intervalle je ne dois plus continuer le remboursement.

M. KURSNER : Je prends note de ce qui précède. Nous examinerons les conditions de la remise et rendrons une décision ».

Qu'au vu de ce qui précède, le recours est devenu sans objet.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Statuant

Donne acte au SPC de ce qu'il examinera les conditions de la remise, et rendra une décision, à sa meilleure convenance.

Constate que, pour le surplus, le recours est devenu sans objet.

Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière : Brigitte BABEL · La Présidente : Isabelle DUBOIS

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties ainsi qu’à l’Office fédéral des assurances sociales par le greffe le