Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1099/2019 • CJ GE ATAS/1099/2019 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Withdraws Payment Claim; Case Struck From Roll

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1099/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant, having previously filed a payment and declaratory action against the defendant insurer, subsequently notified the court via correspondence dated November 14, 2019, that she no longer had any payment claims against the defendant, rendering her demand without object. Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber of the Court of Justice took note of the withdrawal of the claim and ordered the case to be struck from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant Withdraws Payment Claim; Case Struck From Roll: Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber of the Court of Justice took note of the withdrawal of the claim and ordered the case to be struck from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione creditoria desistenza dall'azione assicuratore vertenza di assicurazione sociale insinuazione del credito sottrazione dei contributi d'assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the final orders regarding the imposition of costs, although not explicitly listed in the brief dispositive provided, standard practice for concluding decisions often implies cost allocation based on the outcome, which here is a case withdrawal.
Generato dall'IA
A/2347/2023
Withdrawal of Social Insurance Claim and Striking of Case from Roll
A/1329/2023
Claimant Withdrawal of Payment Claim Following Settlement
A/803/2014
Payment Claim Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
A/2658/2018
Claim Withdrawal and Removal from Court Roll
A/4470/2011
Applicant's Withdrawal of Insurance Payment Claim

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final orders regarding the imposition of costs, although not explicitly listed in the brief dispositive provided, standard practice for concluding decisions often implies cost allocation based on the outcome, which here is a case withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/5022/2017

### [ATAS/1099/2019](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/2288252) du 27.11.2019 ( LCA ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file//2019/0010/ATAS_001099_2019_A_5022_2017.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/5022/2017 ATAS/1099/2019 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 27 novembre 2019 4ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée c/o Monsieur B______, à GENÈVE, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Yvan JEANNERET · demanderesse

contre

SANITAS ASSURANCES PRIVEES SA, sise Jägergasse 3, ZÜRICH · défenderesse

Vu la demande en paiement et action en constatation de droit déposée par Madame A______ (ci-après la demanderesse) le 21 décembre 2017 à l'encontre de Sanitas assurances privées SA (ci-après la défenderesse) ;

Vu l'arrêt de la chambre de céans du 16 janvier 2019 ;

Vu l'arrêt du Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2019 ;

Vu les écritures des parties ;

Attendu que par courrier du 14 novembre 2019, la demanderesse a indiqué qu'elle n'avait plus de prétention en paiement à faire valoir à l'encontre de la défenderesse et que sa demande devenait en conséquence sans objet et pouvait être rayée du rôle ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait de la demande.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Isabelle CASTILLO · La présidente Catherine TAPPONNIER

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le