Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1060/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1060/2008 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1060/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned a decision related to a municipal administrative procedure where the appellant challenged the rejection of their request for authorization, arguing that the authority had failed to provide a timely decision as required by law. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità comunali revoca della decisione amministrativa censure procedurali decisione incidentale impugnabile ricorso del personale surrogazione dell'ente pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
C/12605/2018
Administrative Silence and Mootness of Appeal Period
A/3962/2013
Appeal Against Administrative Law Decision Upheld
A/243/2017
Appealability of Incidental Administrative Order Compelling Permit Application
A/984/2024
Applicant's Appeal of Administrative Clarification of Prior Court Order Dismissed
A/2563/2009
Applicants' Request for Interpretation of Administrative Ruling Rejected

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/560/2008

### [ATAS/1060/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962024) du 25.09.2008 ( PC ) , ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001060_2008_A_560_2008.pdf)

* /